Rome collapsed because of internal weaknesses, not because of
attacks from foreign invaders.
Answer is a
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
The answer is historical, domestic,picaresque, or gothic The answer is historical, domestic,picaresque, or gothic
An example would be like the commercials of the puppies that are injured or hurt, and they want you to pay them money to help the puppies.
There may be a meaning of this expression that is specialized to some area of literature, but used more generally, an implicit argument would be an argument or position or opinion that is put forth without stating it directly. For example, a disturbing story about a family devastated by a war might constitute an implicit argument that war is bad.
Begin developing a historical argument to answer the historical question
Rome collapsed because of internal weaknesses, not because of attacks from foreign invaders.
an argument is a disagreement between two people while an option is a preffered choice or point of view.
A historical argument presents a claim based on evidence from historical sources and research. It aims to explain and interpret past events, often analyzing the causes and consequences of historical events or developments. Effective historical arguments are supported by strong evidence and critical analysis.
Fighting
A explanation for why a past event happened apex
Answer is a
An example of a valid argument is: "All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal." This argument is valid because the conclusion logically follows from the premises.
The Bill of Rights.
A historical argument is a reasoned interpretation or analysis of historical events, typically supported by evidence from primary and secondary sources. It involves constructing a narrative or thesis based on research and critical thinking to explain past events and their significance. Historical arguments can vary in complexity and focus, addressing specific questions or debates within the field of history.
"Raising the minimum wage leads to increased unemployment" is an example of a controversial argument, as there are differing opinions and research on its impact.
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?