there is ametaphor when chaucer said that the viens of the trees are filled with power due to the presence of water.and he compared water to liquor revives body ,water revives trees.
personification;
the young son ] he compares the stages of sun with that with the humans
Both Beowulf and the prologue to Canterbury Tales utilize epic poetry and employ various literary devices, such as alliteration and kennings. However, Beowulf focuses on heroic deeds and characteristics of its protagonist, while the prologue to Canterbury Tales introduces a diverse group of characters with distinct personalities and motivations. Additionally, Beowulf is rooted in Old English tradition, featuring themes of valor and fate, while the prologue to Canterbury Tales reflects a more satirical and comedic tone.
The Introduction because when you read a book the beginning is called a introduction.
It seems like "figiture langues" may be a misspelling. Based on context, it could possibly refer to "figurative languages," which are languages that use figures of speech, such as metaphors or similes, to convey meaning beyond the literal interpretation of the words. These figures of speech are used to create vivid imagery and evoke emotions in the listener or reader.
There is no reason why it shouldn't. Maybe the prologue contains the essence of the novel, some small morsel of insight that might whet the literary appetite of a new reader. Then the novel can precede, maybe even from some point chronologically earlier than the time setting of the prologue. As the storyline develops it gradually gets closer to the moments that were epitomised in the prologue. Maybe the prologue could be repeated at that point, and the reader will then more fully grasp the significance of the thoughts expressed in the prologue. After all, a prologue is just a preliminary narrative, speech or poem. Doubtless, with some novels, it would be ideal to introduce it again, later, in context, where the poignancy of the prologue will be more fully understood and appreciated. One writing tutor says, of a prologue, that it can be "... a scene taken directly from the book - a few paragraphs inserted only to make us keep reading." The decision whether 'to prologue, or not to prologue' is the author's to make, who will also decide the form of the prologue if one is used. Those wishing to develop their writing skills may wish to make a wide study of novels with prologues, then decide for themselves what advantages there may be in having a prologue. With a broader spectrum of knowledge the author can then make an informed choice regarding prefacing their own novel(s) with a suitable prologue, or not! For more information, see 'Related links' below.
It is good to study figures of speech so that you can recognize them in conversation later in life. People use them a lot, and since figures of speech aren't literal, straight interpretations of the words used, it is easy to get confused. If you didn't know some figures of speech, certain conversations could fly right over your head. ;) Here is a wikipedia article on the subject with some excellent material: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figure_of_speech
The cook
Jumbo shrimp. The fact that 'I could care less.' and 'I couldn't care less.' mean the same thing. (Bryson)
At least 1 and at most 7. It could be 3,999,999.9 rounded to 7 significant figures; It could be 3,999,999 rounded to 6 significant figures; It could be 4,000,015 rounded to 5 significant figures; It could be 4,000,429 rounded to 4 significant figures; It could be 3,999,999 rounded to 3 significant figures; It could be 4,049,999 rounded to 2 significant figures; It could be 4,492,467 rounded to 1 significant figure.
apostrophe: addressing something absent or not human as if it were there or could answer back. example: (to a clock) why aren't you moving faster?
The term itself refers to a particular kind of figure of speech, that of the general referring to the specific or the specific referring to the general. As an example, a person might refer to his car as "my wheels." A warrior in centuries past could call his sword "my steel" or "my blade."
No. Palindromes are a form of word play, and malapropisms are oddly inappropriate words which seem to fit in a given context. But neither could be considered to be figures of speech.A palindrome is a literary device - it uses letters and words to create fanciful, elaborate, or intricate designs.
All geometric figures.