King Duncan I [d. August 14, 1040] ordered the Thane of Cawdor to be dispossessed of his title and executed. In Act 1 Scene 3 of the Shakespearean play, the King huddled with the noble Scotsman Ross. Ross spoke of the invasion of Scotland by Norwegians under the leadership of King Sweno [c. 1016-1035] and through the collaboration of the Thane of Cawdor. The invading Norwegians and discontented Scotsmen were defeated by Macbeth [c. 1014-August 15, 1057]. The Norwegians were forced to pay $10,000 to retrieve and bury their dead. The Thane of Cawdor was forced to give up his worldly title, possessions and life.
He was executed for treason. Presumably the hangman did it. Duncan asks "Is execution done on Cawdor?", and Malcolm says he was there and saw it.
After learning that he killed Macdonwald, the Thane of Cawdor (the traitor of Scotland), Duncan makes Macbeth the new Thane of Cawdor. He makes Macbeth the Thane because of his valiance in battle. After all, when a battle is done now-a days, awards and battle decorations are handed out, and the guys who were the bravest, most valiant soldiers are given awards like the Medal of Honor. Except that Macdonwald (whom Macbeth unseamed from the nave to the chaps) is a totally different person from "That most disloyal traitor, the Thane of Cawdor" (who was captured and later executed "Is execution done on Cawdor?"). In fact, they must have been involved in two totally seperate battles (as indeed they were historically) because Macbeth had no idea that the Thane of Cawdor was a traitor or had been condemned when the witches predict that he will be Cawdor or when Ross announces that he has been given the title. He could not have been involved in that battle. Macbeth was given the title of Thane of Cawdor for his valour in battle all right, but not because he had personally defeated the previous Thane. Macbeth never fought the previous Thane.
In a general way, because he had done good military service to the kingdom. In this respect, he might have given the title equally to Banquo. The fact that Macbeth was of royal blood and a close relative to the king was probably a factor. Duncan was an incurable nepotist as witness his making the feckless and militarily useless Malcolm the Prince of Cumberland. Do not make the mistake of thinking that it was a reward for capturing the traitor Cawdor. Macbeth didn't do that, because if he had, he would never have said shortly afterwards "The Thane of Cawdor lives, a prosperous gentleman! Why do you dress me in borrowed robes?" If he had said that after capturing him Ross would have replied "Because you just finished capturing him on the battlefield you stupid twit!"
The news the bloodstained captain brings to the king in scene 2 was that Macbeth and Banquo had both done an excellent in the battle and that the Thane of Cawdor had betrayed the kingdom.
Greed is the accumulation of possessions in excess. A prime example in the Shakespearean play is the greedy grasp for the kingship that Macbeth [c. 1014-August 15, 1057] and his Lady [b. c. 1015] show. It isn't enough that Macbeth is General to the King's Army and Thane of Cawdor. When he becomes Thane of Cawdor, he immediately considers the crown that the three witches predict will be his. It doesn't matter that King Duncan I [d. August 14, 1040] makes it clear that his elder son, the future King Malcolm III [d. November 13, 1093], is being groomed to succeed him on the job. And Macbeth's Lady is the same way. The powerful Cawdor title and the profitable, wealthy Cawdor possessions aren't an end. They become the means to a royal end.
There are more than three, but three of them are that Macbeth would become king, that Banquo's heirs would become king, and that no harm would come to Macbeth until Birnam Wood came to Dunsinane.
I had done my HSC and I want to Complete my Graduation directly
Macbeth in his soliloquy in Act 1 Scene 7 starting with the words, "If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere best it were done quickly" gives a number of reasons why he should not kill Duncan. He had many more reasons for not killing King Duncan than for carrying out the killing. For example, he owed the King respect as as cousin, host, and subject. Killing the King disrespected Duncan's position as benefactor, cousin, guest, and king. Additionally, the King was beloved and respected by the people of Scotland, and they were likely to be outraged by his murder. Finally, if people got the idea that you could become king by killing the king, wouldn't they do the same to Macbeth if he became king in this way? (And of course this is exactly what happened.) In addition he says to his wife that he should enjoy his new titles while they are still new. There was only one reason that Macbeth could offer himself in favor of the murder. That sole reason was his ambition, and Macbeth didn't think much of it, calling it "vaulting ambition which o'erleaps itself". Macbeth was a loyal servant to Duncan and saw Duncan as a great king. Duncan was also an esteemed guest at the house of Macbeth at the time. Killing Duncan went against all of these logical reasons Macbeth had thought of.
According to the Shakespearean play, Macbeth [d. August 15, 1057] was beheaded. He lost his life during a sword fight with Macduff. Macduff mortally wounded Macbeth. He then cut off his head to show to the combined English and Scottish forces under the subsequent King Malcolm III [d. November 13, 1093]. Additionally, the Thane of Cawdor may have been beheaded. He was convicted of treachery to his king and his country. The punishment was execution. The means was unspecified. So it may have been by hanging, or by beheading.
Because his wife convinced him that he would gain much power. Without her poor influences he probably would not have killed Duncan. he was said to be very loyal, but he never gave off the vibe that he liked the King, and how he was ruling.
"Wake Duncan with thy knocking! I wish thou couldst!" Yes, Macbeth regrets killing Duncan.
Duncan's grooms, who he and Lady Macbeth have framed for the murder of Duncan. He claims to have been infuriated at their apparent guilt, when in fact he just wanted to shut them up.