answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General Arts & Entertainment

Why was there no king or queen of England between 1649 and 1660?

Charles the first . The above does not answer the question. Charles I was executed in 1649 and England became a 'Commonwealth' under Oliver Cromwell. In 1660, Charles' son was invited back to England to become Charles II, England having become tired of the Commonwealth.


Who propose the tolerate inactive in 1649?

The Toleration Act of 1649 was proposed by the English Parliament during the time of the Commonwealth under Oliver Cromwell. It aimed to grant religious freedom to various Protestant sects, allowing them to worship freely without the constraints of the Church of England. This act was part of a broader movement toward religious tolerance during a period of significant political and social upheaval in England.


Who was made monarch in 1660?

In 1660, Charles II was restored to the throne of England, marking the beginning of the Restoration period after years of republican rule under Oliver Cromwell and the Commonwealth. His return to the monarchy followed the collapse of the Protectorate and was formalized by the Declaration of Breda, which promised a general pardon and religious tolerance. Charles II's reign is often associated with a cultural revival and the reopening of theaters that had been closed during the Interregnum.


What did Charles Is fate demonstrate?

Charles I's fate demonstrated the profound consequences of political conflict and the struggle for power between monarchy and parliamentary authority in 17th century England. His execution in 1649 symbolized the triumph of republican ideals over absolute monarchy, leading to the establishment of the Commonwealth under Oliver Cromwell. This event highlighted the tensions between royal prerogative and the emerging concepts of democracy and governance by consent. Ultimately, it served as a pivotal moment in shaping modern notions of state and individual rights.


Charles the 2nd was coronated where?

Charles II was coronated at Westminster Abbey in London on April 23, 1661. His coronation marked the restoration of the monarchy after the English Civil War and the interregnum period under Oliver Cromwell. The event was significant in reaffirming the monarchy's role in England following years of political turmoil.

Related Questions

What was banned under oliver cromwells rule?

Under Oliver Cromwell's rule, particularly during the period of the Commonwealth (1649-1658), various activities and institutions were banned or heavily restricted. Notably, the monarchy was abolished, and the Church of England was disestablished, leading to the suppression of Anglican practices. Additionally, activities deemed immoral, such as theater performances, dancing, and certain forms of entertainment, were prohibited, reflecting Cromwell's Puritanical values.


Which didnt occur under cromwells commonwealth?

Prop. 215, Legalization of Medicinal/Recreational use of Marijuana'


Why was there no king or queen of England between 1649 and 1660?

Charles the first . The above does not answer the question. Charles I was executed in 1649 and England became a 'Commonwealth' under Oliver Cromwell. In 1660, Charles' son was invited back to England to become Charles II, England having become tired of the Commonwealth.


What type of government ruled England after the civil war?

The English Commonwealth was the loosely used term for the system of government after the regicide of Charles I. The rump parliament declared England a Commonwealth although by definition England was actually a Protectorate under the Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell.


What was the government under Oliver Cromwell in England?

The Protectorate


What was the government under Oliver Cromwell in England called?

The Protectorate


What was the government under oliver cromwell called?

Cromwell created a 'commonweath' - that is the principle that the state exists for the masses and not for the king (the masses meant the merchant classes, the peasants were simply ignored). The Commonwealth principle has existed in England (and the successor states) since.


Who banned Christmas in England in the seventeenth century?

The English Puritans weren't keen on celebrating Christmas, as they regarded it as a continuation of a pagan festival. The Puritans were in control from 1649-1660.puritansim not sure but i know king Charles the second brought it back


During the time that England was without a monarch what was the country called?

A Republic? Under Cromwell,between the reigns of Charles 1 and Charles 11,England was described as being a Commonwealth.


Oliver cromwell considered England under Charles I as full of what traits.?

Oliver Cromwell considered England under Charles I as autocratic, corrupt, and oppressive. He believed that Charles I ruled with absolute power, disregarding the rights and liberties of the people. Cromwell saw the government as highly corrupt, favoring the wealthy and aristocrats, and oppressing the commoners.


What was England like under the rule of Oliver Cromwell?

Under Oliver Cromwell's rule, England experienced a period known as the Commonwealth, which lasted from 1649 to 1660. Cromwell, a key figure in the English Civil War, established a Puritanical regime that emphasized strict moral codes and religious observance, often suppressing dissenting beliefs. His leadership saw the consolidation of power through the New Model Army and a focus on military governance, which led to both stability and unrest. The period was marked by significant political and social upheaval, including the expansion of English influence overseas.


What was meant by the phrase cavalier commonwealth?

The phrase "Cavalier Commonwealth" refers to the period during the English Civil War and the subsequent establishment of the Commonwealth under Oliver Cromwell, contrasting the royalist supporters of King Charles I (Cavaliers) with the Parliamentarians. The term encapsulates the tension between the royalist ideology, which favored monarchy and traditional hierarchies, and the emerging republicanism that sought to dismantle these structures. It highlights the cultural and political clash between these factions and the broader implications for governance and society in 17th-century England.