answersLogoWhite

0

A Tenant-Farmer, who gave a share to his landlord for rent, was a sharecropper. The landlord was the title-holder on the land. The Tenant-Farmer performed agricultural duties on the land: plowing, seeding, tending, and harvesting. At harvest, a 'share' of the crops went to the landlord, as payment of rent or partial rent. Therefore, the sharecropper and family sometimes (not always) got a house to live in and work. But like many kinds of menial 'employment' (such as coal miners in the mid-1800s), the 'owner' made out better than the 'employer', here the landlord/land owner. Many landlords demanded over 50% of the crops, or higher. Obviously, this meant less crops the shareholder could sell, so their income potential was far less than it could be if the Tenant-Farmer had owned the land he and his family worked.


Even today in the US, some forms of 'sharecropping' arrangements exist. But the 'terms' are often more fair-handed.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What group was least likely to prosper after the war?

The Sharecroppers farmers in the south will like not prosper after the war.


Who was least likely to prosper in the South during the Gilded Age?

Sharecroppers


Sentence for prosper?

After a couple of difficult years, the company began to prosper


What was probably true about constracts between landowners amd sharecroppers?

Contracts between landowners and sharecroppers were often characterized by imbalanced power dynamics, typically favoring the landowners. Sharecroppers frequently faced exploitative terms, including high rent and a share of the crop that left them with little profit after expenses. Additionally, these contracts often included clauses that made it difficult for sharecroppers to leave or improve their economic situation, trapping them in a cycle of debt and dependency. As a result, many sharecroppers struggled to achieve true economic independence.


What of food did the sharecroppers plant?

Sharecroppers could have planted:CottonRiceCorn


What were the advantages for the sharecroppers?

They were no longer enslaved but many became sharecroppers.


Were all sharecroppers African American?

No, all sharecroppers were not African American


What was probably true about contacts between landowners and sharecroppers?

Contacts between landowners and sharecroppers were likely characterized by a power imbalance, with landowners exerting significant control over the terms of the sharecropping agreements. Sharecroppers often faced exploitative conditions, including high rents and unfair debt cycles, which made it difficult for them to achieve economic independence. Communication may have been limited, with landowners typically prioritizing their profits over the welfare of the sharecroppers. Overall, these interactions were often marked by tension and inequality.


How was money divided during sharecropping?

During sharecropping, the money earned from the sale of crops was typically divided between landowners and sharecroppers based on a pre-agreed arrangement. Sharecroppers, who worked the land, would receive a portion of the profits, often ranging from one-third to one-half, while the landowner kept the remainder. However, many sharecroppers faced debts due to high rents and costs for supplies, making it difficult for them to accumulate wealth. This system often kept sharecroppers in a cycle of poverty and dependency.


What was a major reason for the cycle of debt and poverty most sharecroppers experienced their hard work?

A major reason for the cycle of debt and poverty that most sharecroppers experienced was the exploitative system of credit and the high prices for necessary supplies. Sharecroppers often had to borrow money from landowners for seeds, tools, and food, which led to high levels of debt. Additionally, the system typically paid them a fraction of the value of their crops, making it difficult to escape financial hardship. This dependence on landowners and the lack of fair wages perpetuated a cycle of poverty for many sharecroppers.


An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was?

An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was that sharecroppers had more independence and autonomy in their work. While still facing challenges, sharecroppers had the opportunity to negotiate terms and potentially earn a share of the profits from their labor.


Why did many farmers become sharecroppers?

So many freedmen and poor whites became sharecroppers.