answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer
  1. Science investigates difficult questions about unknown fields, and scientists are human, so it is inevitable that scientific findings will not be perfect. However, science works by investigating more and more, which means results get checked and rechecked with further findings. The reason some findings change is because they get corrected. This process of correction helps make science one of the most successful areas of human endeavor. The people who cannot be trusted are those who are always right.

  2. As more evidence accumulates, scientific findings become more and more certain. Theories that have withstood several decades of study may undergo more refinement of details, but it is almost inconceivable that they would be overturned completely.
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

It is impossible to make universal, all encompassing, statements about our experiences. We can observe and test such an insignificant part of all potential experiences, that it is not possible for any humanly devised knowledge system to make generalizations that are absolute. All our inductions must always be tentative and never final.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Science comes up with ideas about of its previous knowlege to explain something new about the Physical world. if these ideas are to represent a natural phenomena by theorethical formulation,then they are tested thru experimentation. This is basically the natural path of the scientific method which originated from any one of our ancestors with some common sense.

If the observer of the experiment is able to match the results with the prediction in the theory ,The results are then proving the theory to be correct.

However is it? Scientific fact are always open to question until another theory and tests prove other wise.

There is no absolute in Science; "all our equations are only appoximations."

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Scientific facts and theories are developed to explain observations of our surroundings. These were made since a very long time ago. With time however, the precision and accuracy with which observations could be made was improved, new techniques and experiments were used. This made it necessary to change the scientific facts and theories to make them in line with and explain the latest observations while not contradicting past observations.

A clear example of this is the model of the atom.

J.J Thomson proposed the plum-pudding model of an atom, in which there were negatively charged particles (the plums) in a positively charged 'pudding'.

After the alpha-scattering experiment was made, Ernst Rutherford proposed that the model of the atom had to be changed to that consisting of a very small and dense positively charged nucleus with electrons orbiting around the nucleus in fixed defined shells.

With the birth of quantum theory, the model of the atom had to be changed again: The elementary particles of the atom were no longer neutrons, protons and electrons. The previously fixed and defined shells of the electrons orbiting the nucleus were changed into orbitals, which represent a space around the nucleus where there is a high probability of finding an electron.

The new model of the atom can still be changed in the future so that it can explain the observations from the experiments which we are or will perform.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

boosey

Lvl 2
3y ago

improvements in math, physics, astronomy, Biology, and chemistry changed the opinions of people about life. Scientists constantly make new observations in order to help us in the future and instead they find details that prove previous theories wrong or change old ones.Scientists constantly make new observations in order to help us in the future and instead they find details that prove previous theories wrong. it was previously believed that losing a large amount of blood was a cure for multiple illnesses and that travelling on trains would cause brain damage. However over time scientists perform new experiments or repeat old ones in order to confirm the results and the theory of others which result in new theories or a change in old ones.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Its not exactly that they were wrong or that it changes, they just find new information.

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

boosey

Lvl 1
3y ago
improvements in math, physics, astronomy, biology, and chemistry changed the opinions of people about life. Scientists constantly make new observations in order to help us in the future and instead they find details that prove previous theories wrong

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Yes, scientific facts are absolute & unchanging.

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

LA Reid

Lvl 1
2y ago
Science is considered an art since it can be altered as more information becomes available. Science cannot be absolute nor unchanging.

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Are scientific fact absolute and unchanging?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is a scientific fact is something that is absolute and unchanging?

I believe not.


Why is Scientific Fact not unchanging?

All in science, even facts, are tentative and subject to revision. It once was a fact that the earth was flat, but mow we know better and have a theory to explain the fact that the earth is a spheroid.


What does immuable?

Unchanging over time or unable to be changed: "an immutable fact"


What does immuable mean?

Unchanging over time or unable to be changed: "an immutable fact"


How is 'truth' defined?

'Truth' is defined as: NOUN 1) the general notion of objectivity; what exists independently of the mind; the world as it is, regardless of human belief or knowledge about it 2) the correspondence or conformity of thought or language to fact or reality 3) a thought or statement that corresponds or conforms to fact or reality 4) the doctrines of a specified religion considered as divine revelation and to be absolute and unchanging 5) the empirical evidence obtained by observation and experiment as employed by the scientific method


IS scientific knowledge rigid and unchanging or constantly being revised and refined?

Scientific knowledge will never be complete, there will always be questions that need answers.


Is true about Scientific knowledge?

Scientific knowledge is not absolute.


What do you call an unchanging value in a formula in excel?

It can be called a constant or fixed value. If it is not a value but a cell reference then it can be called an absolute reference.


What is a scientific fact called?

a scientific fact is called data.


Is a thesis a statement of absolute fact?

A thesis is not a statement of absolute fact. A thesis is usually an opinion supported by a lot of quality research.


Could a scientific fact be disproven?

There is no absolute knowledge in science that can never be disproven even in principle. It does sometimes turn out that scientists are wrong, and what they considered to be a fact turns out not to be one. I would add that it is more usual for scientists to revise theories, than to reject what was considered to be a fact, but it does happen.


What are the angles of an isosceles triangle?

They can be any size. The only unchanging 'fact' which is true about all isosceles triangles is that two of them are equal.