observations and hypotheses are related let me just say it like this u need one of the other to make the other one with out one there would be the other one
A hypotheses is a possible answer to a scientific question or explanation for a set of observations.
Hypotheses are testable statements or predictions that can be evaluated through observation and experimentation. Observations provide empirical evidence that can support or refute these hypotheses. In scientific inquiry, the relationship is cyclical: observations lead to the formulation of hypotheses, which in turn guide further observations and experiments to deepen understanding. This iterative process helps refine theories and expand knowledge within a given field.
Observations provide the empirical evidence that informs and shapes hypotheses. A hypothesis is a testable prediction or explanation based on initial observations. By conducting experiments and gathering further observations, researchers can either support or refute their hypotheses, leading to a deeper understanding of the phenomena being studied. This iterative process is fundamental to the scientific method.
To accurately determine which of Janice's observations is explained by Hypothesis I but not by Hypothesis II, we would need specific details about the hypotheses and the observations. Without that context, it's impossible to pinpoint the unique explanatory power of Hypothesis I over Hypothesis II. Please provide more information about the hypotheses and observations for a precise answer.
theory
A hypotheses is a possible answer to a scientific question or explanation for a set of observations.
Observations provide the empirical evidence that informs and shapes hypotheses. A hypothesis is a testable prediction or explanation based on initial observations. By conducting experiments and gathering further observations, researchers can either support or refute their hypotheses, leading to a deeper understanding of the phenomena being studied. This iterative process is fundamental to the scientific method.
After making careful observations, scientists construct hypotheses to explain their observations. These hypotheses are then tested through experiments to determine their validity. Based on the results of experiments, scientists may revise their hypotheses or draw conclusions to further advance knowledge in the field.
collecting data
Scientists learn from their observations by analyzing patterns, making connections between different observations, and forming hypotheses to explain their findings. They then design experiments to test these hypotheses and refine their understanding of the natural world through observation and experimentation.
Laws are neither explanations or hypotheses; they just state a fact. Laws can be considered as a consensus of observations on a particular phenomenon.
theory
To accurately determine which of Janice's observations is explained by Hypothesis I but not by Hypothesis II, we would need specific details about the hypotheses and the observations. Without that context, it's impossible to pinpoint the unique explanatory power of Hypothesis I over Hypothesis II. Please provide more information about the hypotheses and observations for a precise answer.
theory
a theory
Scientists review existing literature, conduct observations and experiments, analyze data, and consider any previous findings or theories related to the topic before forming hypotheses. This process helps ensure that their hypotheses are well-informed and based on sound reasoning and evidence.
theory