answersLogoWhite

0

Observations provide the empirical evidence that informs and shapes hypotheses. A hypothesis is a testable prediction or explanation based on initial observations. By conducting experiments and gathering further observations, researchers can either support or refute their hypotheses, leading to a deeper understanding of the phenomena being studied. This iterative process is fundamental to the scientific method.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

4mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General Science
Related Questions

What is scientific hypotheses?

A hypotheses is a possible answer to a scientific question or explanation for a set of observations.


What is the Relationship between hypotheses and observations?

Hypotheses are testable statements or predictions that can be evaluated through observation and experimentation. Observations provide empirical evidence that can support or refute these hypotheses. In scientific inquiry, the relationship is cyclical: observations lead to the formulation of hypotheses, which in turn guide further observations and experiments to deepen understanding. This iterative process helps refine theories and expand knowledge within a given field.


After making careful observations sctientist construct?

After making careful observations, scientists construct hypotheses to explain their observations. These hypotheses are then tested through experiments to determine their validity. Based on the results of experiments, scientists may revise their hypotheses or draw conclusions to further advance knowledge in the field.


How are hypotheses tested?

collecting data


How do scientist learn from their observations?

Scientists learn from their observations by analyzing patterns, making connections between different observations, and forming hypotheses to explain their findings. They then design experiments to test these hypotheses and refine their understanding of the natural world through observation and experimentation.


Are Laws explanations or hypotheses?

Laws are neither explanations or hypotheses; they just state a fact. Laws can be considered as a consensus of observations on a particular phenomenon.


Is a well-tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations and hypotheses?

theory


Which of Janice's observations is explained by Hypothesis I but not by Hypothesis II?

To accurately determine which of Janice's observations is explained by Hypothesis I but not by Hypothesis II, we would need specific details about the hypotheses and the observations. Without that context, it's impossible to pinpoint the unique explanatory power of Hypothesis I over Hypothesis II. Please provide more information about the hypotheses and observations for a precise answer.


What is a unifying explanation for a broad range of hypotheses and observations that have been supported by a testing?

theory


What is a well tested explanation that unified a broad range of observations and hypotheses?

a theory


What is unifying explanation for a broad range of hypotheses and observations that have been supported by testing is called?

theory


What is a unifying explanation for a broad range of hypotheses and observations that have been supported by testing called?

theory