There are numerous more specific and detailed predictions that follow logically from evolutionary theory, and that could, if observations were found to be inconsistent with them, lead to the falsification of evolutionary theory.
Science has no capacity to completely prove something... However these are some facts that make it likely to be true. - An extensive fossil record which completely conforms to predictions. - Observing evolution in action (such as the flu virus changing ever year, the HIV virus changing all the time, speciation in plants and animals in non-lab environments, lab experiments etc). - Paternity testing (the techniques used in paternity testing are also used to demonstrate how closely related different species are). - DNA (all organisms use the exact same code for proteins) - similarities in phylogeny (why do we share so many features with other organisms?) - similarities in DNA conform to the predictions made by evolution
I think science can prove it. Because, thanks to evolution birds evolved from dinosaurs. Obviously these were very basic birds of course but then came the more complex, sub species of birds. The hen did come first, as it took millions of years of evolution to create it. And though many may disagree and say that you need an egg to create a hen, well in this case.. Evolution created the hen, which will then create the egg.
They are against it because it goes against their beliefs, so they try to prove it wrong but only end up losing.
In science, a hypothesis and a theory differs in that a hypothesis is a conjecture based on empirical observation or theoretical derivation yet unproven or by any experimental work, and that a theory is a hypothesis that has been rigorously tested by many researchers and supported by strong evidence. Evolution is a theory that has been repeatedly tested, supported by overwhelming evidence, and can be used to explain natural phenomenon very well.
No, since there were no hominid skulls found during his lifetime. What most people refer to as the faked missing link skull is the Piltdown man: Found in a gravel pit in Sussex England in 1912.
to prove evolution
used to prove the analogous homologous characteristics of evolution
No, of course not. Evidence does not prove evolution - it validates the theory.Evidence which Darwin had included limited fossils, and observed apparent speciation in birds.
Yes. However, it is possible to PROVE the validity of evolution on an evidential basis.
They do not. Nothing "disproves" evolution. It is impossible to prove or disprove anything scientifically. That's a basic rule of science: everything is subjected to doubt.
Scientists do not prove things. Lamarck's theory is long refuted as acquired characteristics and the use and disuse concepts are not explanations for evolution of populations.
They can't prove anything about Charles Darwin's evolution. Here's the thing they cant prove, along with everything else, humans being able to reason. Apes can't do that, they do everything by instinct.
Law and math prove things. Science supports tentative ( more or less ) explanations of natural phenomenon with evidence. The evidence overwhelmingly supports evolutionary theory. PS Evolution itself is a observed and observable fact.
Science has no capacity to completely prove something... However these are some facts that make it likely to be true. - An extensive fossil record which completely conforms to predictions. - Observing evolution in action (such as the flu virus changing ever year, the HIV virus changing all the time, speciation in plants and animals in non-lab environments, lab experiments etc). - Paternity testing (the techniques used in paternity testing are also used to demonstrate how closely related different species are). - DNA (all organisms use the exact same code for proteins) - similarities in phylogeny (why do we share so many features with other organisms?) - similarities in DNA conform to the predictions made by evolution
I am sorry to say no. A centaur is a mythical creature. And science has yet to prove the evolution of at least one new species.
I think science can prove it. Because, thanks to evolution birds evolved from dinosaurs. Obviously these were very basic birds of course but then came the more complex, sub species of birds. The hen did come first, as it took millions of years of evolution to create it. And though many may disagree and say that you need an egg to create a hen, well in this case.. Evolution created the hen, which will then create the egg.
They are against it because it goes against their beliefs, so they try to prove it wrong but only end up losing.