Because all of the observations and evidence are used for support.
Scientists had made observations that did not fit exactly with Dalton's theory. Scientists changed the atomic theory to include this new knowledge. While the modern atomic theory is based on Dalton's theory, it is also very different.
If observations don't match the theory, then either the theory or the experiment is wrong. Maybe a measuring device isn't sensitive or accurate enough. If the experiment is right, but results doesn't match theory, then it's time to come up with a new theoru that matches the experiment's results.
If a new theory better fits the data overall or simply because new and significant data disagrees or the method which brought about the original theory is invalid.
Scientific theories enable scientists to make accurate predictions about new situations.
yes. if a new scientist comes along that is more educated a theory can change. over time scientists learn more and more about topics and they can be updated when new information is discovered.
Scientists determine the accuracy of a new theory by testing it through experiments, observations, and data analysis to see if it can successfully explain and predict natural phenomena. The theory also needs to be able to withstand scrutiny, peer review, and reproducibility by other scientists in the field before it is accepted as accurate.
if new evidence doesn't support a scientific theory, scientists will either revise the theory to accommodate the new evidence or discard the theory altogether in favor of a more accurate explanation. This process is crucial for the progress of science as it ensures that theories are continuously tested and refined to reflect our understanding of the natural world.
Scientists may reject a theory if new evidence contradicts it, if it fails to make accurate predictions, or if a better theory emerges that explains the data more effectively. Rejection of a theory is a normal part of the scientific process as it leads to the refinement and advancement of knowledge.
Scientists had made observations that did not fit exactly with Dalton's theory. Scientists changed the atomic theory to include this new knowledge. While the modern atomic theory is based on Dalton's theory, it is also very different.
In theory, scientists describe how they obtained their results (a) so that other researchers can verify the validity of the research, and (b ) so that new research can be built on what has been done before.
If observations don't match the theory, then either the theory or the experiment is wrong. Maybe a measuring device isn't sensitive or accurate enough. If the experiment is right, but results doesn't match theory, then it's time to come up with a new theoru that matches the experiment's results.
If new observations do not fit exactly with the current theory.
If a new theory better fits the data overall or simply because new and significant data disagrees or the method which brought about the original theory is invalid.
Scientists are most likely to change a scientific theory if new evidence contradicts the existing theory, if the theory fails to explain new observations accurately, or if a more comprehensive theory emerges that better explains the phenomena in question. Scientific theories are constantly refined and updated based on rigorous testing and evidence.
Scientific theories enable scientists to make accurate predictions about new situations.
A theory can change through new evidence that contradicts or supports it, advancements in technology that allow for more accurate measurements or observations, or through improvements in scientific understanding. As scientists gather more data and knowledge, theories may be revised or replaced to better explain the natural world.
If scientists were to discover a new type of organism that does not fit the characteristics of cells as defined by cell theory, such as lacking a cell membrane or having a fundamentally different structure, then they may consider revising the cell theory to account for this new finding.