0
What piece of evidence would cause scientists to decide that cell theory would need to be revised?
If scientists were to discover a new type of organism that does not fit the characteristics of cells as defined by cell theory, such as lacking a cell membrane or having a fundamentally different structure, then they may consider revising the cell theory to account for this new finding.
What else can I help you with?
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory scientists will most likely?
if new evidence doesn't support a scientific theory, scientists will either revise the theory to accommodate the new evidence or discard the theory altogether in favor of a more accurate explanation. This process is crucial for the progress of science as it ensures that theories are continuously tested and refined to reflect our understanding of the natural world.
What do scientists think about the theory of evolution?
The scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the theory of evolution. It is considered the foundational framework for understanding the history of life on Earth and is supported by a wide range of evidence from fields such as paleontology, genetics, and comparative anatomy. Scientific understanding of evolution continues to evolve as new evidence and discoveries emerge.
Explain the statement No theory is written in stone?
This statement means that no scientific theory is considered absolute or final. Theories are continually analyzed, tested, and refined based on new evidence and research. They can be revised or even replaced as our understanding of the natural world evolves.
Why are scientists more reluctant to accept Charles Darwin's theory?
Scientists were having the same problem that Darwin thought would happen. In Darwin's mind his theory took away the need for a God. Darwin's theory of evolution challenged both the Religious and the science community. Some scientists still have the same shallow mind that other scientists had during Darwin's time.
How do scientists know that organisms have changed over time?
Scientists use evidence from the fossil record, comparative anatomy, DNA analysis, and observations of natural selection to understand how organisms have changed over time. By studying these pieces of evidence, scientists can track the gradual changes in species over generations, providing strong support for the theory of evolution.
Can the future cause a theory to be revised or discarded?
Yes, new evidence or developments in the future can cause a scientific theory to be revised or even discarded. As our understanding of the world grows and advances, theories must evolve to fit the new information. This process is a fundamental part of the scientific method.
What is the theory that all the scientists provided evidence for the cell theory?
For their own benefits.
If after extensive research the expected observations predicted by a theory fail to materialize then the theory .?
may need to be revised or even discarded altogether. It is important for scientific theories to be tested against empirical evidence, and if the evidence does not support the predictions of the theory, it calls into question the validity of the theory itself. Scientists may need to go back to the drawing board to develop a new theory that better explains the observations.
How can you be open-minded in science?
Scientific theories are revised all the time, in light of new observations and new analysis. Scientists are always prepared to learn something new; that is the nature of science. There are sometimes cases in which scientists have become too attached to an existing theory, but eventually the weight of evidence will always enable a better theory to gain acceptance.
Who were the two scientists that brought forth supporting evidence to wegener's theory?
me and your mom
What does it mean when scientists develope a theory versus a law?
When scientists develop a theory, it is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence. Theories can be revised or replaced based on new evidence or insight. In contrast, a law is a statement that describes a consistent natural phenomenon under certain conditions, usually expressed as a mathematical equation. Laws are typically simpler and more specific than theories.
When would scientists need to change a theory?
Scientists had made observations that did not fit exactly with Dalton's theory. Scientists changed the atomic theory to include this new knowledge. While the modern atomic theory is based on Dalton's theory, it is also very different.
Why were most scientists disagreeing with Alfred Wegeners continental drift theory?
There was no evidence to prove it
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory scientists will most likely?
if new evidence doesn't support a scientific theory, scientists will either revise the theory to accommodate the new evidence or discard the theory altogether in favor of a more accurate explanation. This process is crucial for the progress of science as it ensures that theories are continuously tested and refined to reflect our understanding of the natural world.
How can a theory change?
A theory can change through new evidence that contradicts or supports it, advancements in technology that allow for more accurate measurements or observations, or through improvements in scientific understanding. As scientists gather more data and knowledge, theories may be revised or replaced to better explain the natural world.
Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
Do you think it's wise for scientists not to accept a theory immediately even if the theory has a lot of evidence to support it?
Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.
