Not at all. The first example we can think of is the real image of what you see,
formed on the retina of your eye, which is inverted. We suspect that all real
images are inverted.
A2. From a grammatical point of view, real and image are not the same thing.
Images may be reversed, inverted, or even be negative. It may be better to refer to a 'normal' image rather than real.
The image formed at the retina is always real and inverted but the brain interprets it as erect. the object you see will not be inverted.
Because when you extend the light rays, they diverge and never meet. so you must always extend the light rays back behind the object, this will always result in the image being upright and erect. Meaning it will always be virtual, never real.
-- You don't 'see' a virtual image, unless it somehow continues to your eye and forms a real image there. -- The image formed on the light-sensitive surface of your eye is, as you said, real and inverted. The brain does a neat job of interpreting it as an erect image. When experimental subjects are fitted with glasses that invert the image before it enters the eye, so that it arrives at the retina upside-down, the subject's brain is able to make the correction within a few hours and everything works fine again.
Concave lens (diverging) produces an upright image that is virtual. Although to create a real upright image would require 2 convex (converging) lens with a distance of their respective focal lengths between them.
real, inverted and magnification less than one
no it does not produce real image . it produce virtual and erect image
No, a diverging lens will always form a virtual image. This is because the light rays diverge after passing through the lens, preventing them from actually converging to a real focal point where an image could be formed.
real is were you see them and everything.. and virtual is a bad way to date because theirs perves,sickos,and so on!!
A concave mirror placed between the focus and the pole will always produce an erect, diminished, and virtual image.
No, virtual images can be either erect or inverted depending on the type of mirror or lens and the object's position relative to the focal point. Real images are always inverted due to the way light rays converge at the image point.
The image formed at the retina is always real and inverted but the brain interprets it as erect. the object you see will not be inverted.
Because when you extend the light rays, they diverge and never meet. so you must always extend the light rays back behind the object, this will always result in the image being upright and erect. Meaning it will always be virtual, never real.
A converging lens produces a real image on a screen when the object is placed beyond the lens's focal point. The image is inverted and can be larger or smaller, depending on the distance between the object and the lens.
In the plane mirror, our image will be seen as same size of us and erect. In case of concave mirror, our image will be inverted. This is because concave mirror forms real, inverted image when object is placed behind the focus of the mirror. In case of convex mirror, the size of the image will be diminished, or smaller than us and the image will be erect too. This is because the image formed is virtual and erect.
yes it always produces a virtual image. it is always erect. Its size is always diminshed. Distance from the mirror is always between Focus and Pole
An erect image refers to an optical image that is oriented the same way as the object it is created from. This type of image is seen in mirrors, lenses, and other optical systems where the image appears right-side up in relation to the object being viewed.
Metaphorically the eye interprets the image, but more precisely it is the brain which interprets the image, and the brain learns to do so in a functional manner. An inverted image would make it harder to understand what you are seeing, so the brain rotates it to be erect.