Of course there is! History is the (often biased) record of humanities progress through the ages and Science is one of our achievements as a species being the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.
If you study the various histories of the nations through the ages you can see how in its infancy the Scientific principle arose independently in Greece, China, India and sometimes devolved into Alchemy before eventually coming to the fore again at the end of the 16th century, at least in Europe though a more scientific approach to various paths of discovery had flourished under Islam much earlier than that.
The fall of Rome combined with the extremely repressive and ignorant attitude of the Church made Europe a relative latecomer in scientific contributions although Gutenbergs contribution of printing from movable type helped to make up the lost time by propagating the contributions of scholars whose contributions might otherwise have been lost to us.
In fact it's essential to study History to get an accurate idea of how Science as a discipline came into being through the contributions of men and women from all over the known world. Otherwise you tend to get a highly biased Western European version of events that until very recently completely ignored the contributions of other nations, especially China.
There are various connections between history and science. History has been greatly influenced by science; certainly the world today, in 2013, is a much different world, I would even say an utterly different world, than what it would have been had science never been developed. Science itself also has a history and the history of science has been studied by historians. And finally, historical investigations are often aided by scientific methodology and technology, for example, the use of carbon dating to find out how old something actually is.
engineer
How isn't it? Science is the method of understanding the natural world. Is not History part of the natural world and has not Science been used in history?
History belongs to the branch of archeology in science.
Science investigates models of natural law using repeatable experiments as the ultimate arbiter. In contrast, history investigates past events by considering physical evidence, documentary evidence, and eyewitness testimony.
the only link between science and reality is that when we discover something about science, it becomes reality because everything in reality can be explained by science.
Yes.
Tourism teaches history
For a short history of chemistry see the link below.
The History of technology 21st Century is listed in the link below. There hasn't been much science discovery other than Technology based.A large amount of science has been discovered in the past 100 years.
They both create using a formula.
There are various connections between history and science. History has been greatly influenced by science; certainly the world today, in 2013, is a much different world, I would even say an utterly different world, than what it would have been had science never been developed. Science itself also has a history and the history of science has been studied by historians. And finally, historical investigations are often aided by scientific methodology and technology, for example, the use of carbon dating to find out how old something actually is.
The science of Earth and its history is called geology.
engineer
Social Sciences include the study of economics, geography, history, political science, psychology, social studies, and sociology. Natural sciences are the disciplines that study Dichotomy between formalism and world veiw.
Science in History was created in 1954.
History is a science because, the method used to evaluate historical sources is closely related to the scientific method. In school, history is considered a "social science."