0
Reasoning results in a conclusion that is not logically connected to the premise?
Naynay09
Faulty
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In reasoning the conclusion derived from the premise is likely to be valid but is not necessarily so?
Inductive
What are the 3 parts of a conclusion in the scientific method?
The three parts to a conclusion: 1. Restates the main premise 2. Presents one or two general sentences which accurately summarise your arguments which support the main premise 3. Provides a general warning of the consequences of not following the premise that you put forward and/or a general statement of how the community will benefit from following that premise
What type of reasoning was used in the development of evolutionary theory?
A Theory is a hypothesis that has withstood testing, but cannot be proven infallibly true, meaning that the only way to form a theory is through scientific testing. Reasoning is necessary to form a hypothesis, which will be considered a theory once tested and supported by the results. Two types of reasoning are Inductive Reasoning and Deductive Reasoning.Inductive ReasoningMaking observations and extrapolating to come to a conclusion beyond the scope of current information. i.e.The grass outside is greenthereforeAll grass is greenDeductive ReasoningUsing logic to reach a conclusion, specifically when the conclusion necessarily follows the premise(s). i.e.This mouse is grayandAll gray mice are fastthereforeThis mouse is fastOnce you have a hypothesis, it can be tested using the Scientific Method.Scientific MethodAsk a questionDo background researchConstruct a hypothesisTest your hypothesis using an experimentAnalyze data and draw a conclusionCommunicate your resultsIf the results of the experiment support the hypothesis, then it is considered true. If others are able to duplicate the experiment and achieve the same results, the hypothesis will be considered a theory.inductive
What kind of reasoning is often used to form theories?
A Theory is a hypothesis that has withstood testing, but cannot be proven infallibly true, meaning that the only way to form a theory is through scientific testing. Reasoning is necessary to form a hypothesis, which will be considered a theory once tested and supported by the results. Two types of reasoning are Inductive Reasoning and Deductive Reasoning.Inductive ReasoningMaking observations and extrapolating to come to a conclusion beyond the scope of current information. i.e.The grass outside is greenthereforeAll grass is greenDeductive ReasoningUsing logic to reach a conclusion, specifically when the conclusion necessarily follows the premise(s). i.e.This mouse is grayandAll gray mice are fastthereforeThis mouse is fastOnce you have a hypothesis, it can be tested using the Scientific Method.Scientific MethodAsk a questionDo background researchConstruct a hypothesisTest your hypothesis using an experimentAnalyze data and draw a conclusionCommunicate your resultsIf the results of the experiment support the hypothesis, then it is considered true. If others are able to duplicate the experiment and achieve the same results, the hypothesis will be considered a theory.inductive
What is an implied premise?
What is an explicit premise
What kind of reasoning results in a conclusion that is not logically connected to its premise?
Faulty Apex :P
Do conclusions that are not logically supported invalidate the entire study?
Not necessarily. A conclusion can still be valid if there is no logically possible solution where the premise is true and the conclusion is false.
What are the two parts of an argument?
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
What is minor premise?
A premise has one term in common with a conclusion. A minor premise contains the minor term in the conclusion, which is the subject. It can be described as a subtle or deceptive argument or deductive reasoning.
In reasoning the conclusion derived from the premise is likely to be valid but is not necessarily so?
Inductive
Four steps of deductive reasoning?
The four steps to inductive reasoning are... 1.) start with a premise 2.) build on premise with if then statements 3.) make equation or something else to prove something right. 4.) conclusion "this is true by deductive reasoning"
What does negate the premise mean?
A premise is the fact or supposition upon which a chain of logic is based. If it is true, and logic (reasoning) is correctly applied, then the conclusion reached by the chain of logic is also true. When you negate the premise, you show that the premise is not true and that, therefore, the conclusion is not true, or at the least, has not been demonstrate to be true.
What type of reasoning is used when a scientist tests a hypothesis?
That would be deductive reasoning, as this type of reasoning moves from a general premise (an hypothesis) to a more specific conclusion (theory).
Premise 1 If being humble is thinking of others then does it logicly follow that if p 2 one were to buy an item for ones personal entertainment conclusion 2 one would be selfish and therefore greedy?
Premise 1 is false. Even if it were correct, conclusion 2 doesn't logically follow.
The argument that states People who major in engineering are good in math you are good in math so you should major in engineering is?
It is invalid because the conclusion does not follow logically from the premise.
What type of argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion?
This is called deductive reasoning, where an accepted premise is applied to a specific instance.
His argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion or from a general premise to a general conclusion?
Valid Argument
