0
What else can I help you with?
Reasoning results in a conclusion that is not logically connected to the premise?
Faulty
A t is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations?
A syllogism is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific premises or observations. It typically consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion that logically follows from the two premises. For example, if all humans are mortal (major premise) and Socrates is a human (minor premise), then it concludes that Socrates is mortal. This method of reasoning helps to clarify relationships between different statements and can be used to derive new knowledge from established facts.
What are the 3 parts of a conclusion in the scientific method?
The three parts to a conclusion: 1. Restates the main premise 2. Presents one or two general sentences which accurately summarise your arguments which support the main premise 3. Provides a general warning of the consequences of not following the premise that you put forward and/or a general statement of how the community will benefit from following that premise
Is tautology circular reasoning?
Tautology and circular reasoning are related concepts but not the same. A tautology is a statement that is true in all possible interpretations, often redundantly stating the same idea (e.g., "It will either rain tomorrow or it won't"). Circular reasoning, on the other hand, is a logical fallacy where the conclusion is included in the premise, effectively assuming what it is trying to prove. While both involve a lack of informative content, tautology is a logical truth, whereas circular reasoning undermines the argument's validity.
What type of reasoning was used in the development of evolutionary theory?
A Theory is a hypothesis that has withstood testing, but cannot be proven infallibly true, meaning that the only way to form a theory is through scientific testing. Reasoning is necessary to form a hypothesis, which will be considered a theory once tested and supported by the results. Two types of reasoning are Inductive Reasoning and Deductive Reasoning.Inductive ReasoningMaking observations and extrapolating to come to a conclusion beyond the scope of current information. i.e.The grass outside is greenthereforeAll grass is greenDeductive ReasoningUsing logic to reach a conclusion, specifically when the conclusion necessarily follows the premise(s). i.e.This mouse is grayandAll gray mice are fastthereforeThis mouse is fastOnce you have a hypothesis, it can be tested using the Scientific Method.Scientific MethodAsk a questionDo background researchConstruct a hypothesisTest your hypothesis using an experimentAnalyze data and draw a conclusionCommunicate your resultsIf the results of the experiment support the hypothesis, then it is considered true. If others are able to duplicate the experiment and achieve the same results, the hypothesis will be considered a theory.inductive
If a premise and the conclusion are true the argument is true?
Not necessarily. An argument is not automatically true just because the premise and conclusion are true. The reasoning connecting the premise to the conclusion must also be valid for the argument to be considered true.
What is a deductive argument?
A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premise. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. It is a form of reasoning that aims to provide logically conclusive evidence for the conclusion.
Reasoning results in a conclusion that is not logically connected to the premise?
Faulty
What is minor premise?
A premise has one term in common with a conclusion. A minor premise contains the minor term in the conclusion, which is the subject. It can be described as a subtle or deceptive argument or deductive reasoning.
Four steps of deductive reasoning?
The four steps to inductive reasoning are... 1.) start with a premise 2.) build on premise with if then statements 3.) make equation or something else to prove something right. 4.) conclusion "this is true by deductive reasoning"
What kind of reasoning results in a conclusion that is not logically connected to its premise?
Faulty Apex :P
What are the two parts of an argument?
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
A t is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations?
A syllogism is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific premises or observations. It typically consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion that logically follows from the two premises. For example, if all humans are mortal (major premise) and Socrates is a human (minor premise), then it concludes that Socrates is mortal. This method of reasoning helps to clarify relationships between different statements and can be used to derive new knowledge from established facts.
What makes a valid argument invalid?
A valid argument becomes invalid when it contains a logical fallacy, such as a false premise or faulty reasoning. Additionally, if the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the premises provided, the argument is considered invalid.
What does negate the premise mean?
A premise is the fact or supposition upon which a chain of logic is based. If it is true, and logic (reasoning) is correctly applied, then the conclusion reached by the chain of logic is also true. When you negate the premise, you show that the premise is not true and that, therefore, the conclusion is not true, or at the least, has not been demonstrate to be true.
What are the Steps in deductive reasoning model?
Start with a general principle or premise. Apply the principle to a specific case or situation. Draw a conclusion based on the application of the principle to the specific case. Assess the validity of the conclusion based on the initial premise.
What type of argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion?
A deductive argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion. It involves moving from a premise that is universally accepted to a specific conclusion that logically follows from that premise.
