The scientists that found the fossils found that were found on different continents. Some of the same fossil were located on each Continent that could only survive in one climate. Therefore, a fossil provided some evidence for the continental drift to be true.
Well it wasn't so much climate as the fossils that have been found. Fossils have been found in Antarctica of plants that only occur in tropical climates so at one point it must have had a tropical climate. That is the most dramatic example but there are more subtle ones that led him to believe that the continents, at one point, must have been in different locations on the Earth and then moved to where they currently are.
when results from the experiments repeatedly fail to support the hypothesis.
You obtain objective evidence to support it by undertaking experiments designed to test the veracity of the hypothesis.
The conclusions tell why the data support or reject the hypothesis.
The scientific process is a systematic method for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. It typically involves making observations, forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test the hypothesis, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. If the results support the hypothesis, it may lead to a theory; if not, the hypothesis may be revised or rejected. This iterative cycle fosters continuous learning and refinement of scientific understanding.
Because of sea floor spreading
Fossils found on separate continents that are now far apart provide evidence for continental drift. Similar fossil species found on continents that were once connected suggest that these landmasses were once united. Additionally, matching rock formations and paleoclimate evidence from fossils support the hypothesis of continental drift.
Because of sea floor spreading
Fossils of the same species can be found on continents that are now today separated by oceans. btw continental drift is a fact.
Yes, fossils and rocks support the hypothesis of continental drift. Matching plant and animal fossils found on different continents suggest they were once part of the same landmass. Rocks with similar ages and compositions found across continents also provide evidence for the movement of these landmasses over time.
Fossils support his hypothesis.
Fossils found on different continents that were once connected support the idea of continental drift. The similarities in fossilized plants and animals found on separate continents suggest these landmasses were once part of the same supercontinent. This evidence helps corroborate the hypothesis of continental drift proposed by Alfred Wegener.
well it wasn't so much climate as the fossils that have been found
Yes, fossil evidence such as similar plant and animal species found on separate continents has been used to support the continental drift hypothesis. The distribution of fossils across continents suggests that these land masses were once connected and later moved apart.
Evidence supporting the hypothesis of continental drift includes the fit of continental coastlines, matching rock formations and fossils across continents, and the alignment of mountain ranges. Additionally, the distribution of ancient glacial deposits and paleoclimate data further support the idea that continents were once connected.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
Fossils of the same species can be found on continents that are now today separated by oceans. btw continental drift is a fact.