One of the possible ways that scientists could use as an alternative is vitro testing. This is when they use cells and skin from the outside of the human body.
why could wegener alfred be called a interdisciplinary scientist
They might just want to retest ,but there are other reasons not everyone could be sure of that.
you could be killed in the line of work
A scientist might use a model as a research method for a few reasons. This model could tell the scientist how something moves for example.
you could get harmed by some chemicalsss
Animals can die from cosmetic testing as could humans.
Animals are tested because they are healthy and no disease they could possibly have or any meds they are on will effect what they are doing with the testing.
People could still have reactions to the product that was tested on animals!!! People could still have reactions to the product that was tested on animals!!!
The only animals besides snakes that are considered to be "serpentine" in shape are spiders and beetles because of the way their legs are formed and move.
all scientist believe animals can think because if an animal could not think it would not move or do anything. they need to think 'move' to move etc.
They would say how stupid humans are for testing on them and thinking that just because animals don't look like humans, they don't have feelings...I wish animals could talk.
Yes it is very wrong! Think about it. They have no idea if their product is going to cause a reaction. The animal could suffer from allergic reactions, skin conditions, and could have fatal results. In my opion testing makeup on animals is animal abuse.
you just don't because it is called animal testing and cruelty and it could kill them.
Yes, plant-based testing methods are being developed as an alternative to animal testing. These methods use plant cells, tissues, or whole plants to study the effects of chemicals and products. Plant-based testing is considered more sustainable and ethical than using animals for testing.
Because animal tests are cruel and animals could die.
in my opinion i think its terrible to test on poor animals , but in a way there are two sides to it it is obviously much better then having to test on a human, as it could harm them but animals could get hurt too !
The disadvantages are:It could harm the animalsPeople might not want to test on animals so as a business you could lose staffanimals could become dangerousanimal testing could be run as a business so more intent on making money than actually caring for the animalsAnimals could be mistreatedThe biggest disadvantage of animal testing is the harm, pain and confinement of the animal.The biggest disadvantage of animal testing is that the animals used for testing are not humans and any results derived from animal testing may or may not be useful to humans. I can be a matter of the animals suffering for nothing.Another important thing to keep in mind about animal testing is the frivolous nature of the substances tested on animals. Most animal testing is not for the purpose of evaluating lifesaving drugs but for outright commercial purposes, such as cosmetics, food additives to make something keep its puffiness or enhance its color, or an ingredient added to a product to enable marketing to call it new and improved when in fact it doesn't work any better it's just a new color or texture.