Because animal tests are cruel and animals could die.
No, there is an international agreement on banning testing, which the US observes
One argument against is that it involves experimenting with the health and safety of human beings. An argument for is that although effects of drugs on animals may be similar to their effects on humans, some effects may be specific to human beings only. Another is that testing drugs on human beings may result in unexpected negative results for the subjects.
Some of the arguments for are that it saves human lives, humans are superior to animals and the animals do not know that its happening. Some of the arguments against animal testing are its cruel to animals, animals have rights as well, you should treat animals the same as humans and theres alternatives out there to animal testing. On one side you have the for the other against. The opposing position against probably says it is nessacary for the animal testing because animals are about the same as humans. On the against position animal testing is wrong because it can cause the animal deadly pain and diseases. But I think there should be a human in the place of an animal because animals have feelings.
Testing people, but many go against that even though the animals don't deserve to be tested on like they are as important as a piece of nasty trash.
The use of DNA testing can support arguments against the death penalty as it has revealed cases of wrongful convictions, highlighting flaws and errors in the criminal justice system. It underscores the possibility of irreversible mistakes, making the argument that the risk of executing an innocent person is too high. DNA testing has helped exonerate individuals on death row, strengthening the case against capital punishment.
they are testing if its real or not <3
is the testing really worth it
pharmacological testing relates the aspect of effectable drug against a particular disease.
Concept testing is important so that advertising dollars and creation money is not wasted. If a concept fails in testing, the company will take another direction.
A control group is important so you can tell if the thing you are testing changes whatever you are testing it on in any way.
NO
WHats a good thesis statement against animal testing