The different types of evidence used by scientists to support the Theory of Evolution include:
As scientists explore down the geological column, they see changes that are remarkably consistent with the Theory of Evolution. One example is the transition of sarcopterygian lungfish into Devonian amphibians. Another is Archeopteryx, an excellent transitional fossil to the avian dinosaurs.
With advances in our knowledge of DNA, scientists can reliably date when two related species, such as when chimpanzees and hominids, first split from a common ancestor.
In the absence of evolution, it could be expected that species would be randomly distributed around the world, wherever environmental conditions suited a species. Instead, species that are closely related by evolution are found in close proximity, but not in more distant areas that would also be environmentally suitable. One example is that virtually all mammals native to Australia are marsupials. The placentals (besides bats, rats, mice, and dingos) did not make it across the Pacific barrier.
A good scientific theory should be capable of predicting facts not already known. The Theory of Evolution was used to predict that a transition species between fish and early amphibians should be found in an appropriate location, such as certain areas of the Canadian Arctic. The outcome was the discovery of ancient Tiktaalik roseae fossils.
Fossils of transitional species are common, rife in the geologic record. Many of the Devonian amphibians are excellent examples of this.
Another example is the evolution of drug resistance in bacteria. A particular drug may prove 100% fatal to colonies of a particular type of bacteria, but over generations a mutation will crop up creating a resistance that continued exposure to ever increasing dosages becomes fixed within the population. This evolution has been observed and carefully documented.
There are literally thousands of other examples. Every year biologists publish hundreds of peer reviewed papers detailing one or another example of evolution.
The theory predicts that evolution will happen and in certain ways. The observed evolution makes this prediction correct. It also defines evolution as happening, and as such is perfect evidence in support of it.
There is strong support for the theory of evolution due to fossils that have been found by archeologists. The fossil records show evidence of evolution over billions of years.
There is no proven theory of evolution only the physical evidence of what Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
A theory is an idea system with a lot of evidence to support it--for example, the theory of evolution. A law (in science) is an idea system with proof attached to it--no contradictions--example, the law of gravitation.
Fossils can be used as evidence for evolution because they can show the development of a species over a long period of time.
The four pieces of evidence that support the theory of evolution are the fossil record showing transitional forms, homologous structures in different species indicating a common ancestor, genetic similarities between different species, and observable examples of natural selection in action.
Fossil records, anatomical similarities, embryological development, and genetic similarities are all forms of evidence that support the theory of evolution. These pieces of evidence show the gradual changes in species over time and provide support for the idea that all organisms are related through common ancestry.
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
The theory predicts that evolution will happen and in certain ways. The observed evolution makes this prediction correct. It also defines evolution as happening, and as such is perfect evidence in support of it.
I do not so much " believe it " as I an convinced by the myriad lines of converging evidences that support the theory of evolution by natural selection. talkorigins.org
There is strong support for the theory of evolution due to fossils that have been found by archeologists. The fossil records show evidence of evolution over billions of years.
I am a geologist and I know of no theory of "geologic evolution". "Evolution" as defined by Darwin describes the origin of species based on the survival of the fittest. This certainly can not be applied to geological processes, although life is integral to geology.
There is no proven theory of evolution only the physical evidence of what Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
The primary evidence supporting evolution comes from a combination of fossil records, comparative anatomy, embryology, molecular biology, and observed genetic changes over time. These pieces of evidence collectively provide a strong foundation for the theory of evolution.
The three main pieces of evidence for the theory of evolution by natural selection are the fossil record showing transitional forms, comparative anatomy and embryology demonstrating similarities between different species, and molecular biology revealing genetic similarities indicating common ancestry.
Probably more in the line of many converging pieces of evidence in support of theory. Theory is explanation and fossils are just mineralized bones in the rock. which need and explanation. The fossil record supports the theory of evolution by natural selection and, some say, the theory of punctuated equilibrium.
Four pieces of evidence used by Alfred Wegener to support his theory of continental drift were the fit of the continents, matching geological formations across continents, similar fossil distributions, and glacial evidence in tropical regions.