Double blind
I dnt kno
To ensure their results are considered stable and trustworthy
Well, sometimes the answer is specific to the investigation, but you can usually produce a set of better results, by repeating the experiment at least 3 times. If the results are all similar, you can know that they are reliable, but if there is an anomaly, it is most likely, that that set of results are not accurate and you shouldn't use these when you produce your average. (if you decide to have an average. Hope this helps!
Theory
repeatablility
Take a look at any definition for TCP protocol. Most are also written in C.
Because these results are the most recent and serious.
I dnt kno
The most effective experiment strategy to test a hypothesis is to design a controlled experiment with a clear independent variable that can be manipulated and a dependent variable that can be measured. Random assignment of subjects to experimental and control groups can help minimize bias and ensure the results are reliable.
A well-designed experiment with a large sample size and controlled variables typically produces the most reliable results. Additionally, experiments that are repeated multiple times to account for variability and ensure consistency tend to yield reliable outcomes.
the main difference between UDP and TCP is that UDP is not a reliable protocol.
The experimental probability is figured out when a person goes through the trouble of actually trying it out. Theoretical probability is when a person comes to a conclusion of what is most likely, based off of the experiment results.
IP (Internet Protocol)
To ensure their results are considered stable and trustworthy
you will find the coefficeint theoretically and then will compare with the experimental results, the one which is most nearest is the mechanism.
Preparing a neutral solution of acid ensures that the acidic solution is at a pH where the analyte of interest is in its most stable form for accurate analysis. By neutralizing the acid, any potential interference from excess protons is eliminated, allowing for more precise and reliable experimental results.
Reliable? Hmm. Peter knew the most about Jesus but was not reliable. I'd say that Paul was the most reliable witness.