i dont know if its is true, but plate tectonics
Mountain start to form.
the telli tubes
A rift valley is formed.
phylogenetic tree
a hypothesis is given to explain a phenomena which has not been explained till then. it can be supported by an experiment if that experiment gets the other results regarding that particular phenomena in agreement with that being predicted by the hypothesis and if any contradictory fact arises or the result doesnt match the prediction then the hypothesis is again thought upon or totally discarded at times
The Null Hypothesis. May be referred to as (H0). It is a statistical test and tricky in that this Null hypothesis can never be tested, so is tested in conjunction with some other hypothesis in such a way as the testing procedure, measurements made, will be done in a way as to show which hypothesis is more likely. An example is given in Wikipedia regarding the tossing of a coin is worth viewing. Null Hypothesis : we have a normal coin Alternative Hypothesis one: we have a double headed coin alternative Hypothesis two: Some unknown influence on an not normal coin if a coin is tossed many times, say 100, and comes up heads each time the Null hypothesis is least likely of the three and REJECTED in favour of one of the other alternatives. if the coin flips over and over and over easily but always lands heads up, most likely hypothesis two is correct and the Null Hypothesis REJECTED. if the coin acts real strange by not going end over end and immediately falls very quickly down to land one particular side up hypothesis three is more likely and the Null Hypothesis REJECTED. if the coin acts normally going end over end and lands about as many times heads as it does tails the Null Hypothesis is RETAINED as most likely. The Null Hypothesis is either retained [kept as most likely true] or it is rejected in favour of the alternative. so it can be seen choosing which alternative to test against is always best and the simplest is generally the one to look at. refer also Ocams Razor.
no because the hypothesis is a guess to try and predict of what the conclusion is going to be, and it dosent matter if it dosent support the conclusion the experiment is still right
When the elodea is in the light it will do photosynthesis, and a product of this is CO2 . Some of the CO2 reacts with the water to become carbonic acid. This causes the water to be more acidic. When the plant is in the dark it respirates to get energy from the sugars it has produced. A product of this is O2 gas, which makes water more neutral. Depending on the pH test used the color will be different.
i dont know if its is true, but plate tectonics
The data collected in an experiment test a hypothesis. A hypothesis is an educated guess about a specific question, usually regarding science.
hypothesis
One hypothesis is that plant cells emerged as the product of an endosymbiosis between "primitive" eukaryotic cells and cyanobacteria.
A hypothesis is a testable prediction about some kind of phenomena. Regarding a river full of garbage, a good hypothesis might be, 'When the river is heavily polluted, the fish in the river will die.'
phylogenetic tree
The metaphysical branch of physics is about the philosophy of physics. Ontology is one of the most important hypothesis studying the nature of existence.
Lamarck's incorrect hypothesis regarding inheritance.... Lamarck did not know how traits were inherited (Traits are passed through genes) Genes are not changed by activities in life. They change through mutation occurs before an organism is born.
23
23
I am on the same question
the going on experiment regarding god element in Geneva will surely get a success regarding the formation of solar system and universe