The primary product of "cold fusion" is heat. At least in one of the primary paths that result in things seen in this class of reactions. There is alo some credible evidence of transmutation from some of the more reputable labs. Brillouin Energy has shown reliable and controllable heat production. While the technology is looking very promising, it is progressing slowly due to a lack of investment. Compared to things like hot fusion work however, Brillouin Energy has 5 fully functional control systems driving two different types of reactors. This has been achieved having raised < U$D20 Million. This is a tiny fraction of any hotfusion project I am aware of.
In the sun the product of the nuclear fusion is light energy and heat energy. It also created helium from the isotopes deuterium and tritium.
Because the nuclei involved have to be squeezed very hard together, to overcome the repulsion that similar charges naturally have for each other (ie electrostatic repulsion). In fact in experiments on earth with tokamaks, the pressure is not high but temperatures have to be made extremely high, higher than in stars where pressure at the star's centre is very much higher than can be achieved on earth. This is to encourage the nuclei to get close enough for fusion to occur, but so far on earth only short bursts of fusion have been achieved, whereas the sun has been burning for billions of years.
molar heat of fusion
Lead is a heavy metal. An element. Atomic number 82 (has 82 protons in nucleus). Symbol is Pb, which comes from its Latin name plumbum. It is also the most nuclear stable element. That is, it is the end product of fusion. It is the heaviest element that is produced under normal fusion conditions in a star. Heavier elements (produced usually in supernova) decay usually into lead.
The latent heat of evaporation
Cold Fusion - Doctor Who - was created in 1996.
A fusion reaction generates helium as a waste product.
Yes
Cold Fusion - 2011 is rated/received certificates of: Germany:16 Singapore:PG13
neither cold fusion nor warp fields exist.
Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons proposed cold fusion in 1989, although it was proven to be an invalid concept that did not work.
I think you mean "Cold Fusion" It is the (currently) hypothetical nuclear fusion reaction which happens at ambient temperatures?
"Cold fusion" refers to fusion at (or near) room temperature, rather than the millions of degrees that are normally required. This has not been achieved so far - at least, not to any significant degree.
The cold fusion theory is controversial because it proposes a way to generate energy by fusing atoms at room temperature, contradicting traditional fusion theory. Many scientists are skeptical of cold fusion due to the lack of consistent, reproducible experimental results and the failure to explain the underlying mechanism adequately. The initial claim of cold fusion in 1989 was met with skepticism and debate in the scientific community, contributing to its controversial status.
Cold fusion is a type of nuclear reaction that occurs at or near room temperature, leading to significant energy production. The specific formula for cold fusion is not well understood or documented, as the process is still a subject of ongoing research and debate in the scientific community.
Cold fusion
It is generally thought that reports of cold fusion made in the past were in error, for one reason or another. It seems unlikely from theory. There is a Wikipedia article if you want to read it.