0
What else can I help you with?
What instruments or technologies might have helped determine whether or not something is living or dead?
microscopes and computers
Why might there be different kinds of thermometers for measuring temperature?
Because intelli wires are at the oppossite poles of magnification fields of gratifying specific functions that get transferred to the uvula.
What does the word could mean?
The word "could" implies a future possibility that might or might not happen.
If you could magnify a droplet of water hundreds of thousands of times what might you see?
If the water was not absolutely pure and sterile, you'd see organisms living in it - enough magnification and you could examine their cell structure and identify the DNA, etc. Also whatever impurities were in the water - bits of organic waste matter, undissolved minerals, precipitates. Though you wouldn't be able to see the water molecules themselves without a VERY powerful microscope.
What do low and high power objectives do?
the difference between the low power and high power objectives on a microscope are that the low power objective has a lesser magnification than the high power objective
What might you be able to see at 4000x magnification that you cant see with these microscopes?
At 4000x magnification, you can see things like detailed cellular structures, individual bacteria, or very small particles that may not be visible with lower magnification microscopes, such as light microscopes. This level of magnification allows for viewing intricate details at a much smaller scale.
What might you be able to see at 4000x magnification?
At 4000x magnification, you may be able to see detailed structures of cells, bacteria, and other microorganisms. This level of magnification can reveal intricate features such as cell organelles, cellular membranes, and microbial flagella. It is also useful for studying nanomaterials and nanoparticles in research and industry.
What would be visible in human cheek cells at 4000x magnification?
At 4000x magnification, you would be able to see the individual cells making up the human cheek tissue. You might also be able to observe the nucleus within each cell, as well as any organelles present, such as mitochondria or cell membranes. Additionally, you might see cell boundaries and potentially some cellular structures like vacuoles or cytoplasmic granules.
Are there an instruments powerful enough to magnify atoms so they can be seen?
No I have to add that "no" might not be entirely the correct answer. Here's a wiki entry about "Atomic Force Microscopes". It also includes actual pics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_force_microscope It works very differently than the microscopes we are used to. It's a good read, check it out.
What is the total magnification of a microscope if the microscope is on high-power?
This depend on type of microscope and in particular which specific model it is. High power may refer to the microscopes ability to enlarge a lot, not that it actually consumes power. In this understanding of the term, the microscope in question might have two separate but combined lenses of which the total magnification can be calculated from. It may have an objective lens and an eye piece lens, both of which that might be changed in order to achieve greater or less magnification. Typical configurations are: Objective lenses of 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 40, 100X magnification Eye piece lenses of 5, 10, 15, 20X magnification. If your microscope fits this configuration, then the maximum magnification you can achieve is 100x20, a magnification of maximum 2000 times. The problem here is the wavelength of visible light. It does not allow for more magnification than approx 1500 times and even this is not a very detailed one.
What is the total magnification using high power?
This depend on type of microscope and in particular which specific model it is. High power may refer to the microscopes ability to enlarge a lot, not that it actually consumes power. In this understanding of the term, the microscope in question might have two separate but combined lenses of which the total magnification can be calculated from. It may have an objective lens and an eye piece lens, both of which that might be changed in order to achieve greater or less magnification. Typical configurations are: Objective lenses of 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 40, 100X magnification Eye piece lenses of 5, 10, 15, 20X magnification. If your microscope fits this configuration, then the maximum magnification you can achieve is 100x20, a magnification of maximum 2000 times. The problem here is the wavelength of visible light. It does not allow for more magnification than approx 1500 times and even this is not a very detailed one.
What instruments or technologies might have helped determine whether or not something is living or dead?
microscopes and computers
What did Carl Zeiss have to do with microscopes?
Zeiss was active in improving the design and manufacture of microscopes, in advancing the theory of lenses and in creating new types of lens glasses. For more about him you might see his wikipedia article.
What level with High magnification and level of illumination?
The high level of magnification is at a level in order to distinct the image of what you are looking at for example. You would be able to distinguish the shape and be able to see what it might contain within.
What is the first magnificationused to look at a slide?
You start with the lowest magnification. Once you have found the specimen and focused it, you can move it to the next higher magnification. It should still be in focus, although you might need to use the fine adjustment.
Is 100 plus magnification good?
Good for what? Telescope? Microscope? "Magnification" is often used as a marketing tool; telescopes for example might come with a maximum magnification that is too big to get a clear image, just so they can claim "100x magnification" or whatever. And it is cheap to get a magnification that is clearly too much. The most important piece of information about a telescope is, how big is the main lens, or the main mirror. A larger diameter here will give you (a) more light-gathering power, allowing you to see fainter stars, and (b) more resolution, roughly equivalent to usefulmagnification.Good for what? Telescope? Microscope? "Magnification" is often used as a marketing tool; telescopes for example might come with a maximum magnification that is too big to get a clear image, just so they can claim "100x magnification" or whatever. And it is cheap to get a magnification that is clearly too much. The most important piece of information about a telescope is, how big is the main lens, or the main mirror. A larger diameter here will give you (a) more light-gathering power, allowing you to see fainter stars, and (b) more resolution, roughly equivalent to usefulmagnification.Good for what? Telescope? Microscope? "Magnification" is often used as a marketing tool; telescopes for example might come with a maximum magnification that is too big to get a clear image, just so they can claim "100x magnification" or whatever. And it is cheap to get a magnification that is clearly too much. The most important piece of information about a telescope is, how big is the main lens, or the main mirror. A larger diameter here will give you (a) more light-gathering power, allowing you to see fainter stars, and (b) more resolution, roughly equivalent to usefulmagnification.Good for what? Telescope? Microscope? "Magnification" is often used as a marketing tool; telescopes for example might come with a maximum magnification that is too big to get a clear image, just so they can claim "100x magnification" or whatever. And it is cheap to get a magnification that is clearly too much. The most important piece of information about a telescope is, how big is the main lens, or the main mirror. A larger diameter here will give you (a) more light-gathering power, allowing you to see fainter stars, and (b) more resolution, roughly equivalent to usefulmagnification.
Why might a person have trouble viewing their cells with the microscope?
There could be several reasons, such as improper focus adjustment, incorrect lighting settings, dirty lenses, or inadequate staining of the cells. Additionally, the microscope may not be properly calibrated or the magnification level might be too high or too low for the cells being observed.
