they are classifying
No, empirical evidence is based on observation and inference. Qualitative observation is an observation of the qualities of an object. Quantitative observation, on the other hand, is an observation based on some sort of numerical measurement of the object.
I think that it limits what a scientist can study b/c it does cannot talk or explain its past which makes it unfair for the scientist although we do know about some of its past we would love to learn more.It can farther limit by not showing a reaction or a difference.We have to always look precisely and thoroghly. Save
A theory.
albert instine
they are classifying
They may be under observation by scientist. Meaning a scientist may be experimenting with that kind of creature/substance.
observation
they are classifying
they are classifying
some scientific activities use observation such as forensics
Anyone who can ask questions and find the answers. Not afraid that they are going against some in place barriers to the truth. One who has good observation on the happenings around him and try to find the reason for such happenings without any biased view is considered to be a scientist. Of course scientist needs perseverance and deep love with nature and humanity.
This scenario would fall under observations. The scientist noticed that bacteria were not growing in the test tubes, which is an observation of a specific phenomenon. Experimentation involves designing and conducting tests or experiments to investigate hypotheses based on observations. Hypotheses are proposed explanations for observed phenomena that can be tested through experimentation.
No, empirical evidence is based on observation and inference. Qualitative observation is an observation of the qualities of an object. Quantitative observation, on the other hand, is an observation based on some sort of numerical measurement of the object.
An opinion is what some people think and some people don't agree with what they think and an observation is what you see, hear,taste. A observation can be senses. Save
I think that it limits what a scientist can study b/c it does cannot talk or explain its past which makes it unfair for the scientist although we do know about some of its past we would love to learn more.It can farther limit by not showing a reaction or a difference.We have to always look precisely and thoroghly. Save
observation