Direct evidence are visible noticable changes. Indirect evidence is when you might not see the action happen but you do notice the results
Evidence is important in science because if you are doing a science BCR, you will have to have evidence in your BCR in order to make your BCR true.
false, there are many more rules of nature that we have not discovered.suck as things we cant see.
Actually, it is the strongest evidence for evolution. Without one fossil we would know from the DNA evidence that evolution has occurred and is occurring. It is in the DNA of organisms that we see the strongest evidence for common ancestry. The products of those genes are sometimes highly conserved down the ages. Ribosomes, the workbenches on which proteins are made, differ hardly at at between you and pets.
No. A theory is an estimation of "How Nature Works", for which we can make quantitiative predictions. We then test our estimation / model to see what Nature thinks in different places and in different ways, to see how far our estimation makes good approximations. Science does not have all the answers. Science does not have a religious tome writ by God(s) whose word is inviolate, and unquestionable. Science holds that Nature is a lover, that requires attention, admiration, respect, and occasional ducking from flying "cookware". Best to know when the cookware is coming... Or something like that.
To be admissible as evidence, $400-$600. see links
Evidence of the dynamic nature of our planet includes the movement of tectonic plates, which cause earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Additionally, the changing climate patterns, erosion of landscapes, and shifting ocean currents are all indicators of the dynamic processes that continually shape Earth's surface.
you may see them on trees or in nature you may see them on trees or in nature
you can not see evidence of hallucinations but you can see what may be causing and provoking hallucinations such as a tumor.
A "time paradox" is usually associated with time travel. So far, there is no evidence that time travel is possible, so you can't see such paradoxes either.
Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.
Unfortunately we can't see the excerpt so can't answer the question
boang mn mo kamo akong g pangutana nya ako ang inyong patubagon?
Direct evidence are visible noticable changes. Indirect evidence is when you might not see the action happen but you do notice the results
something you use to gather evidence that you cant see.
i see plants and wild life.
glasses help you see what you can't usually see