... # Proceeding from or taking place in a person's mind rather than the external world: a subjective decision. # Particular to a given person; personal: subjective experience.
In the context of science, a subjective observation is fairly useless. Subjective observations can't be seen, heard, tested, measured, compared, etc. They are nothing more than an individual's feelings, thoughts or opinions. An objective observation is something that be seen, heard, counted, measured, compared, etc. Objective observations are observations that can be used to help form hypotheses and make predictions. Subjective observations are just your personal feelings about something. They do nothing to further the scientific process.
Both have their place, but in general, I'd say yes. Quantitative observations are those that show facts, such as 'the subject grew 10cm in the designated time frame.' Qualitative observations can be said to be what you percieve, ie. 'the subject doesn't look as though it has grown much'.
A subjective reasoning is based on how you feel about something more than an actual fact. A scientific thought is emotionless and based on pure facts.
In science, you could make a value statement in saying that you think that one theory fits the observations better than another, or is more elegant, or is preferable in some other way.
Science requires objective validation, not just words.
no
In the context of science, a subjective observation is fairly useless. Subjective observations can't be seen, heard, tested, measured, compared, etc. They are nothing more than an individual's feelings, thoughts or opinions. An objective observation is something that be seen, heard, counted, measured, compared, etc. Objective observations are observations that can be used to help form hypotheses and make predictions. Subjective observations are just your personal feelings about something. They do nothing to further the scientific process.
Truth or reality is objective, and you can not discover an objective reality using subjective means. For example, If wanted to know a rich man's name, you would not say or ask, "what is like being rich?" that would give you a different subjective answer rather than the objective answer your looking for. Using a subjective question to get an objective answer is impossible.Truth is objective and can be held against reality. It is the means used to discover reality that is subjective.
Subjective observations cannot be seen. They are ideas, thoughts, or opinions. If you cannot see it, feel it, hear it, or smell it, it is a subjective observation. Objective observations can be seen. If you can see it, feel it, hear it, or smell it, it is an objective observation. Objective observations can be tested and falsified for objects and concepts that cannot be seen, heard, smelled, felt, or smelled, such as subatomic particles.
more subjective than objective
Fcuk you all kcuf
It is easier to solve a problem when using subjective factors rather than methods brought in from unknown sources which are primarily objective.
Yes, the subjective pronoun "I" is correct as the subjectof the second part of the compound sentence following the conjunction "than" (Natalia is a better cook than I am.) The verb "am" is inferred.If word "than" is functioning as a preposition, the objective pronoun is used (Natalia is a better cook than me.)
It describes the author's life in a subjective way-apex(Conventions of Memoir = more subjective than objective)
Quantitative observations are those which can be measured and/or calculated and expressed in numbers.Example: When you weigh something, you get a measurement which indicates the quantity, rather than quality. You can say that a woman weighs 60 kilos, that is a quantitative observation. Saying that she is beautiful is a qualitative observation, "she has the quality of beauty." Also, quantitative observations are objective while qualitative observations may be subjective. To a colour blind person, a rose may be grey, but put it on a scale and it weighs the same for him as it does for a person with normal colour perception.
Observations from Earth-based telescopes are obscured by the atmosphere.
It is both. Of course there are certain elements of economics that are undoubtedly objectively true, however, positive economics more often than not bases its conclusions on assumptions, and so, by the very fact of using these assumptions to arive at an objective truth, you are making a value judgement, therefore, more often than not, positive statements are objective conclusions based on subjective premises.
This is entirely subjective. You need to decide for yourself.