More surface area.
It will lower the latent heat load so the a/c has more sensible capacity, but the cost of running the dehumidifier will negate any energy savings you may be expecting. As a dehumidifier is just a smaller a/c unit with the warm condenser coil downstream of the cooling coil so as not to provide any cooling effect.
What is more efficient a tungsten light or an incandescent light?
"More bang for your bucks"
chest freezers are more energy and money efficient,but if you have the money upright freezers are far more convenient. chest freezers provide more insulation therefore saving money.
Infrared Heaters are generally more cost efficient then regular space heaters. The reason is that they heat the object directly rather then heating the air, so it wastes less engergy. Ive seen estimates that say its as much as 80% more energy efficient.
A Liebig condenser is about the most simple condenser going. It has a gas or vapor pathway that is enclosed by a jacket of through which a cooling fluid (water, maybe) is passed. The cooling fluid cools the outer surface of the vapor tube and this cooling effect reaches the inner wall of the vapor tube to cool the vapor and cause it to condense. There are a couple of nice drawings that can be viewed by using the link to our friends at Wikipedia.
No. It will be less efficient.
Heat till the liquid boils, if you just want the sugar. If you want both, perform simple distillation, you must put the sugar in a flask, put a flame under the flask, and attach a tube to the flask (must have an airtight fit). Then attach a liebig condenser to the tube, and a receiving tube to the end of the liebig condenser. Have a flask under the receiving tube to collect the liquid. What will happen, as you heat the mixture is: all the liquid will evaporate, go along the tubes, and condense at the liebig condenser back into liquid, and it will dribble into a flask. The sugar will be left in the original flask. Getting both of them is more complicated than getting just the sugar :)
The additon of a condenser, which allowed condensation without the loss of heat in the piston
The additon of a condenser, which allowed condensation without the loss of heat in the piston
The additon of a condenser, which allowed condensation without the loss of heat in the piston
A condenser boiler has a primary and a secondary heat exchanger. Fuel that is used to simply warm up water can be sent to the secondary heat exchanger and reused. This is a substantially more efficient use of energy.
Yes it should be fine. It wont be as efficient as it should be. But it should remove more humidity from the air.
Yes. A procedure known as distillation would need to be done, i.e., take the solution of water and salt and place in a conical flask attached to a Liebig's Condenser and at the end of the condenser, a beaker. The condenser must be circulated with cold water from below and the hot water removed from top. Heat the solution upto 100 C, and the water will collect in the beaker as 'distillate' while the salt will stick to the sides of the flask. (for more details about distillation, refer the Internet) by, Shawkat
Yes, in fact it will lower your energy consumption if you have an energy efficient handler. By running it continuously it lowers the temperature and therefore the condenser will not come on as often. The condenser consumes quite a bit more energy. Handlers are designed to run continuously.
condenser is more detailed for sound
A Reverse cycle Air conditioner is MUCH more efficient than resistance heating. It is called a heat pump, and requires that the Evaporator and Condenser coils of a Closed Refrigerant System be reversed.