0
Why is intelligent design not generally accepted as a scientific explanation for the origin of life on earth?
Answer 1
Intelligent design means that some sort of "designer" started life on earth. This was thought to have happened about 5-6, 000 years ago. It was also thought that the the sun and all the planets revolved round the earth. Many scientists have show that this can not be true. Our ideas of how life started has changed over time. This is actually the definition of evolution.
Answer 2
Science is the process by which we formulate testable, verifiable and falsifiable explanations for observed phenomena. As an example, evolutionary theory explains our observations in Biology and palaeontology in terms of what we know about genetics and population dynamics. Falsifiability of such a thesis is an important component of its testability: without being able to distinguish between the truth and falsehood of a claim, we cannot determine how likely it is to be true. The problem with "intelligent design" is that it has not (yet?) formulated a statement that is both verifiable and falsifiable. "Intelligent design" is simply the statement that "some intelligent designer was involved". However, without knowing something about the nature, methods, motivations and, most importantly, the limitationsof this designer, it is an impossible claim to falsify. For instance, the statement "because some intelligent designer was involved" applies equally well to "why is life organized in a series of nested hierarchies?" as to "why is the planet Earth shaped like a triangle?". Basically, the claim "because some intelligent designer was involved" could be used to answer any question, no matter how ridiculous, without actually explaining anything.
Therefore, until "intelligent design" comes up with a testable model to match their claims, the notion cannot be considered scientific.
What else can I help you with?
What is widely accepted explanation based on experimental result?
A theory is a widely accepted explanation based on experimental results.
The difference between a scientific theory and a scientific law is that a scientific theory?
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
When an explanation to a problem is accepted as always true?
law
What Scientific is the term used for a scientific theory that is generally accepted by an overwhelming number of scientists?
that research and observations support the theorythat research and observations support the theory is the correct answer
Is a widely accepted explanation based on experimental results?
Theory
What is a accepted and universally true explanation of observed facts is a?
A scientific theory is an accepted and universally true explanation of observed facts that is based on evidence, tested through experimentation, and widely accepted by the scientific community.
An accepted and universally true explanation of observed facts is a?
A Guess...!
What is an explanation that is generally accepted only on a series of observations called?
Hypothesis.
What is the difference in theory and scientific law?
A scientific law is an indisputable fact: there are no observances dictating it. For example, gravity is a scientific law. A scientific theory is simply a generally accepted explanation for a particular phenomenon or idea that cannot currently be proven or disproven. The structure of the atom and evolution are theories.
What is another name for well supported and widely accepted explanation of nature?
A theory or a scientific law.
How did the Bohr model affect the scientific thought?
scientist accepted bohr's model as a useful explanation (apex)
Which case ruled that scientific evidence was admissible only if it was generally accepted by the scientific?
The case you are referring to is Frye v. United States (1923). This ruling established the Frye standard, which stated that scientific evidence is admissible in court only if it is generally accepted within the relevant scientific community.
How did Bohr model of the atom affect scientific thought?
scientist accepted bohr's model as a useful explanation (apex)
What is the difference between a hypothesis and a theory in the field of scientific research?
In scientific research, a hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon based on limited evidence, while a theory is a well-established and widely accepted explanation that has been extensively tested and supported by evidence.
What is widely accepted explanation based on experimental result?
A theory is a widely accepted explanation based on experimental results.
What is the scientific name for the Lepidoptera known as the Lined stalk borer?
The accepted scientific name is Maruca vitrata.
What is an alternate history?
An alternate history is a form of scientific speculation as used by historians, one which generally goes against accepted facts of history.
