yes, becasue it shows how old the fossil really is and the form and shape of it
Finding a Paleozoic fossil would change our thinking completely, we would have to rethink the entire evolution of animals and the conditions on Earth all the way back to and including the Paleozoic. That is 500 million years of geologic history to rewrite.
A fossil is not a mineral.
Probably, carbonateous fossil.
Fossil fuels, and anything made from them, uranium and minerals.
A geologist is studying layers of rock He finds a fossil with an imprint of a shelled animal According to the law of faunal and floral succession what kind of fossil would he most likely find next is a fossil of fishes.
The fossil fuels will become extinct in some years.There is no future of fossil fuels.That is why there is so much research going on the alternate fuels.
She would be amazed by how many people are criminals!
evolution occurred
i would feel AMAZED
First of all the animal that the fossil is from was going to a different location and died there, so it would still be there. Also the desert 50 million years ago could have been a forest where many different organisms live.
if someone was amazed, surprised or disgusted
either: cast fossil petrified fossil imprint fossil trace fossil
Finding a Paleozoic fossil would change our thinking completely, we would have to rethink the entire evolution of animals and the conditions on Earth all the way back to and including the Paleozoic. That is 500 million years of geologic history to rewrite.
At Rivet Ravine
I would think a Fox Fossil
Yes it would since they have a similar anatomy to humans in the inner ear, that is they also have semicircular canals and a cochlea. Actually the first inner ear appeared in the fossil record more than 420 Million years ago. Birds are a relatively young animals in evolutionary terms, having appeared only around 150 million years ago.
The Cover Fossil would be the fossilized remains of Tirtouga.