I moved from Washington to Missouri, I found a job right away but it was seasonal. When I was laid off for the winter I had not worked long enough in MO to be eligible for unemployment thru Missouri, so my claim was paid out of Washington (at that state's maximum amount). It was definately a benefit because it paid more than Missouri would have. In fact, I received more in unemployment per week than I got paid per week in Missouri
The Washington State unemployment rate was at 7% as of April 2013. The unemployment rate of Washington, D.C. was at 8.5% during the same month and year.
Only if you qualify for California's unemployment and satisfy their requirements for being out-of-state.
Yes, your claim would merely become inactive and you can reactivate it anytime in the benefit year following when you filed the claim.
In Washington, you can file for an interstate unemployment claim if you use to work in Washington and was fired or laid off and now live another state. Even though you moved out of state, you will still be paid unemployment benefits through Washington.
Yes. The requirements of collecting (actively looking for a job ) are the same but you will need to re-file in the state that you move to in order to continue collecting benefits You do as long as you comply with the California unemployment laws.
There are several websites that list unemployment levels in Washington state. Some of these sites include the United States Department of Labor and Washington State's official website.
It is illegal to collect unemployment benefits while employed in NYS.
Look at a map and figure it out who ever asked this question
Yes, if complying with the interstate unemployment program.
ARKANSAS
3.85% or $560
Creditors can garnish wages in the state of Washington. However, they first have to go through the court system and get a judgment.