A feudal hierarchy was basically a list everyone in Medieval Towns from the most to least powerful. This is how it looks like:
The king
The lords
The vassals
The knights
The peasants
An improvement in this answer:
Hierarchy is not really an issue of social set up, but more based on the language. For instance, Indian languages have a tight code of 'respect' to the top and pejorative 'disrespect', insult and snubbing to the lower man. This involves the effect of feudal language codes. So that even though England has a feudal social set up, in practice the social set up of India, where there is no statutory feudalism is more feudal and suppressing to the lower man.
Moreover, the word 'feudal' as understood in Continental Europe has a very basic difference from that in England. That is due to the language code issue. For understanding this, a very simple comparison of feudal behaviour of the French nobility with that of the English nobility can be had in A Tale of Two Cities.
Now, the theme can be taken a bit forward and it may be mentioned that the term feudalism as understood in Asian and African nations, including India, is quite removed from that understood in Europe and England. This again is due to the terrible lowering quality of the Asian and possibly African languages aimed at the lower classes. In many ways, this is essentially the issue of castes, and the need for apartheid.
For more, Search for MARCH of the EVIL EMPIRES; ENGLISH versus the FEUDAL LANGAUGES!
In English times... the feudal hierarchy was as follows: king-> aristocracy (bishop , baron, duke, then lord) -> knight -> squire -> peasant or serf Feudal system: a rigid hierarchy of rights and duties according to social situation
Nobility (king, knights) Church Peasants Serf/slave
The apothecary would typically fall within the merchant or tradesman class in the feudal hierarchy. They would be considered below the nobility and clergy but above the peasants and serfs in terms of social status and wealth.
from highest to lowest king lord priest knights peasants serfs
There is one major error here: the Catholic Church, while structured as a hierarchy, is not an example of the feudal system.The Pope is the Bishop of Rome, and the formal leader of the Catholic Church.
The relationship between a vassal and the church was the same as the relationship between any other secular person and the church. The vassal was part of the feudal hierarchy, and the church had a separate hierarchy.
The feudal system gave the most power to the monarch or king. They were at the top of the feudal hierarchy and had control over vast amounts of land, resources, and people. The king granted land and privileges to the nobles in exchange for their loyalty and military service.
The feudal system is structured in a hierarchy where the king sits at the top, granting land to powerful nobles known as lords or barons. These lords, in turn, provide land to vassals or knights in exchange for military service and loyalty. At the bottom of the hierarchy are the peasants or serfs, who work the land and provide food and labor, often with limited rights. This system creates a network of obligations and protections among the different levels of society.
In the feudal system, one who pledges homage to a higher master is known as a vassal. The vassal swears loyalty and service to their lord in exchange for land or protection. This relationship is central to the feudal hierarchy, establishing mutual obligations between lords and vassals.
Pilgrims were individuals who undertook religious journeys for spiritual reasons and were not directly tied to the feudal system, which was a social structure based on land ownership and obligations. While some pilgrims may have interacted with the feudal society during their travels, their primary purpose was religious devotion rather than a formal part of the feudal hierarchy.
In a feudal system, society was organized into a hierarchy where the king was at the top, granting land to nobles or lords in exchange for military service and loyalty. The lords, in turn, had vassals—lesser nobles or knights—who served them and provided protection and service in return for land or fiefs. At the bottom of this hierarchy were the peasants or serfs, who worked the land and provided food and labor in exchange for protection and a place to live. This system created a network of obligations and services that defined social and economic relationships in feudal society.
Both the Church and the feudal system had a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command. In the Church, the Pope was at the top followed by cardinals, bishops, and priests. In the feudal system, the king or queen was at the top followed by nobles, knights, and peasants. Both systems relied on loyalty and obedience from those below them in the hierarchy.