No. In 1620 there were no water trade routes. In the Atlantic there is a strong current that runs between England and the east coast of North America. They got into that current and a storm blew them off course to Massachusetts instead of Virginia.
because it was easy for them to travel. C'mon people
Because the Ottomans were definitely Muslim, having got the religion from the Arabs. So, they viewed the Christianity of Europe as an "infidel" religion, and regarded Europe as an enemy. And obviously, you wouldn't want the enemy to use trade routes that ran inside of their territory. Before the Crusades, pilgrims were still allowed to enter the Holy Land, but that area was only on the edge of Ottoman territory. Because of this blockage of trade routes, European sailors had to chart a sea route around Africa, ultimately resulting in Columbus's landmark 1492 voyage.
Several conditions promoted the growth of trade, the relative political stability of the realm, the use of standarize coins, and the availability of good trade routes, newly constructed highways such as the Persian Royal Road and sea routes through the Red Sea, The Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea.
The use of sea routes weakened Meroe primarily because it shifted trade dynamics away from the traditional overland routes that Meroe relied on. As maritime trade became more prominent, neighboring regions and emerging powers could more easily access goods and resources, diminishing Meroe's economic influence. Additionally, this change likely facilitated the rise of competing ports and trade centers along the coast, which further undermined Meroe's strategic position in regional trade networks.
it restricted the use of foreign shipping for trade between england and its colonies, a process which had started in 1651. Their goal was to force colonial development into lines favorable to england, and stop direct colonial trade with the Netherlands, France and other european countries,
Pilgrims did not typically use established trade routes to travel. They often followed specific pilgrimage routes or paths that were significant for their religious or spiritual beliefs. These routes were separate from the commercial trade routes used for transporting goods and commodities.
it's the silk road
a. Europe traded separately from Asia. b. travel time increased. c. India gained control of all trade routes. d. increased use of water trade routes.
THIS MIGHT HELP YOU :) QUESTION: What kind of evidence do historians use to find about trades and trades routes? ANSWER: Nothern Black Polished Ware, the fine pottery were found from several archaeological sites throughout the sub continent and many Roman gold coins which were found in south India as traders carried many goods to home in Caravans from South Indian, several as the kind of evidences trade and trade routes. THANKYOU
because it was easy for them to travel. C'mon people
no, sh did not
because it lead them to were they wanted to go
I can give you several sentences.The trade routes of the sailing ships reached almost all the way around the world.The ships sailed along a trade route to the next port.Land trade routes stopped at all of the major cities in Europe, Asia, and Africa.
The collapse of the Mongol Empire in the 1300s disrupted the overland Silk Road trade routes across Central Asia. Traders turned to the sea routes instead.
sea between europe and africa that people used to use as trade routes
Crazy communist leaders
to travel and trade goods