0
What else can I help you with?
Why was The Missouri Compromise a bad idea?
The Missouri Compromise was considered a bad idea because it only provided a temporary solution to the growing tensions between free and slave states, ultimately failing to address the underlying issues of slavery and sectionalism. By drawing a line to separate free and slave territories, it entrenched the division rather than fostering unity. Additionally, it set a precedent for future compromises that would further complicate the slavery debate, contributing to the eventual outbreak of the Civil War. Ultimately, the compromise highlighted the inability of political solutions to resolve deep moral and social conflicts.
When debating the compromise of 1850 who supported unity?
Henry Clay
Why was the Organization of African unity formed?
whatis the role of the African unity
Who strengthened the Roman Empires unity by granting citizenship to more people in the provinces?
The emperor Caracalla extended Roman citizens to all the freeborn in the Roman Empire. However, he did not do so to strengthen unity. He did it to bring all the inhabitants of the empire under Roman taxation so that he could increase state revenues. Prior to that it was routine policy to grant Roman citizenship to elite men in the provinces who were loyal to Rome to strengthen unity. It was not down to one particular man.
How did manufacturing and tariffs change after the War of 1812?
Economic unity Economic unity
What did thomas Jefferson do to the Missouri compromise?
Thomas Jefferson expressed deep concerns about the Missouri Compromise of 1820, viewing it as a temporary solution to the growing sectional tensions over slavery. He believed it failed to address the underlying issues and predicted that it would lead to increased division between the North and South. Jefferson's apprehension highlighted his belief that the nation was heading toward a conflict over slavery that would ultimately need to be resolved. His reflections emphasized the fragility of national unity in the face of such divisive issues.
When debate the passage of the compromise of 1850 who supported the compromise and support unity?
Henry Clay
When debating the passage of the compromise of the 1850 who supported the compromise and supported unity?
Henry Clay
Why was The Missouri Compromise a bad idea?
The Missouri Compromise was considered a bad idea because it only provided a temporary solution to the growing tensions between free and slave states, ultimately failing to address the underlying issues of slavery and sectionalism. By drawing a line to separate free and slave territories, it entrenched the division rather than fostering unity. Additionally, it set a precedent for future compromises that would further complicate the slavery debate, contributing to the eventual outbreak of the Civil War. Ultimately, the compromise highlighted the inability of political solutions to resolve deep moral and social conflicts.
When debating the compromise of 1850 who supported unity?
Henry Clay
How the Missouri compromise avoided a threat to national unity?
Because one side was free....but the other side had slaves and when both sides got what they wanted they were both happy so it all balanced out and they didn't fight
Who Adopted a policy of religious compromise to restore the unity of England?
Queen Elizabeth I
Is unity born out of division?
Unity can result after division...political examples come to mind....but to answer it in a cause-effect sense, I would say "no" to the answer to your question. Unity is a "cohesive" or centripetal force...something that acts to bring people together. Division is a "centrifugal" force and therefore separates people. What creates divisions can be seen as barriers to unity. If you consider a multi-ethnic community with clearly drawn territories...certain neighborhoods, etc. Many walls/barriers so a lot of division. If a flood strikes the town, there can be instant unity...everyone is certainly in the same boat at at that point. Hard to say that the unity was born out of their division, but they did come together. Then there is the question of temporary or permanent unity. History of the U.S. is full of stories where even wars were fought to create or restore unity.
Why did compromises were reached concerning enslaved people?
Compromises were reached concerning enslaved people in order to maintain unity among the states, especially between the North and South. The Founding Fathers were concerned about balancing the interests of each region to ensure the new nation's stability. As a result, compromises such as the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Missouri Compromise were made to address issues related to slavery.
Is the division of state threatening India's so called 'unity in diversity'?
the 'unity in diversity can't be threatened because of division of states.As different states with different rules cannot be controlled by one, it is good to divide states with there own decisions.........................
How important is unity?
unity is very important in the fact that it helps tie together relationships between races and that helps to increase the country's economy rate. so unity is very important.
What has the author PMH BELL written?
P.M.H BELL has written: 'TWENTIETH-CENTURY EUROPE: UNITY AND DIVISION'
