answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Because one side was free....but the other side had slaves and when both sides got what they wanted they were both happy so it all balanced out and they didn't fight

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How the Missouri compromise avoided a threat to national unity?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What factor takes into account the impact that a compromise would have on your operation AND OPSEC?

risk


What is terrorist threat?

National threat to the security


Is vulnerability the so what factor of risk assessment?

An advantage of integrating OPSEC principles in your day-to-day operations is that it:


During an earthquake the cooling system of a nuclear reaction can be compromise increasing the threat of what?

a meltdown


Are DoD threat levels and national terrorism advisory system threat alerts the same?

No.


George Washington believed that parties could be a threat to?

national unity


How did the George W Bush administration convince Congress and the American people to invade Iraq?

By claiming Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, making it a threat to national security


What phase of the department of defense analyzes the threat to national security?

Planning


What is an easy definition of secret diplomacy?

intent to pursue the goals of foreign policy,through effective means of compromise,pursuation and threat of war.


During what phase the department of defense analyzes the threat to national security?

Planning


What was a major threat to the American national unity during the nineteenths century?

Slavery


What did Reagan see as the chief threat to the national security of the US?

The Soviet Union.