0
When interpreting legal cases, judges decide what the Constitution means by examining the text of the Constitution, historical context, previous court decisions, and the principles of justice and fairness. They aim to apply the Constitution's principles to the specific facts of the case to reach a fair and just decision.
What else can I help you with?
What were judges called in Rome?
In ancient Rome, judges were typically referred to as "praetors." The praetor was an elected magistrate responsible for administering justice and presiding over legal proceedings. There were different types of praetors, such as the praetor urbanus, who dealt with cases involving citizens, and the praetor peregrinus, who handled cases involving foreign nationals. Additionally, in certain contexts, judges could also be called "iudices," referring to individuals appointed to decide specific cases.
What were a judges responsibilities among ancient Hebrews?
The judges adjudicated, and they also taught Torah; and in some cases they also temporarily served as leaders in battle.
What level of court hears the largest number of cases?
The Supreme Court hears the largest number of cases. They have the power to decide appeals on all cases from the other levels of court.
What important element of the Watergate scandal investigation and court cases was not covered by the Constitution?
executive privilege
Ancient Egypt How many other judges also listened?
In ancient Egypt, the judicial system included a hierarchy of judges, often presided over by a chief judge or pharaoh. Typically, there could be a panel of judges, sometimes numbering up to 12, who would listen to cases and provide rulings. However, the exact number of judges involved in any specific case could vary based on the nature of the dispute and the judicial context.
What are the duties of the Supreme Court?
judges if laws and acts of the legislative and executive branches are constitutional
Prior are cases who's principles are used by judges to decide current cases are called?
Precedent cases are those whose principles are used by judges to decide current cases. Judges rely on the decisions and reasoning of prior cases to guide their judgment in similar situations.
Which of the following affects the constitution by applying and interpreting legal cases?
the courts -PrinceBlast
Who decides who wins court cases?
No. He does not decide who wins cases. Under the constitution the judiciary is a separate branch of government. He can change the makeup of the court by appointing judges that agree with his views. By doing the federal court and Supreme Court decisions will influence the cases that they hear.
Do judges decide cases on what they personally think is right?
They are supposed to apply the law that is established in that place.
How do you think Supreme Court judges should decide cases?
Supreme Court judges should decide cases based on a thorough interpretation of the Constitution, relevant laws, and established legal precedents. They should prioritize impartiality and fairness, ensuring that their decisions uphold individual rights and the rule of law. Engaging in careful deliberation and considering the broader implications of their rulings on society is also essential. Ultimately, judges should strive to balance judicial restraint with the need for progressive interpretation in response to evolving societal values.
What is the suprem court do?
They mainly interpret the Constitution and decide the outcomes for Supreme Court cases
What do the suprem court do?
They mainly interpret the Constitution and decide the outcomes for Supreme Court cases
How judges can be summoned?
Judges are not summoned in the course of normal events. They are appointed or elected to their positions. Judges are assigned to a court and sit whenever there are cases or matters they need to decide on. In many places that is a full time job.
What is it called when judges make desicions that closely follow earlier court cases and the words of the constitution?
Judicial restraint....
What is it called when judges make decisions that closley follow earlier court cases and the words of the constitution?
Judicial restraint
How can the supreme court decide cases involving subjects such as wiretapping which did not exist when the constitution was written?
Somehow it all traces back to the constitution
