0
What else can I help you with?
How did Europeans justify their actions towards native populations?
Europeans often justified their actions towards native populations through a belief in cultural superiority, viewing themselves as bringing civilization, Christianity, and progress to what they considered "savage" lands. They employed concepts like the "White Man's Burden," suggesting it was their moral obligation to civilize indigenous peoples. Additionally, legal frameworks and doctrines such as the Doctrine of Discovery legitimized territorial claims and the subjugation of native populations, framing their expansion as a divine or natural right. These justifications were deeply rooted in ethnocentrism and often ignored the rights and humanity of the indigenous peoples.
How did the caribs get their name?
Kalinagos spoke a language called 'Cariban'. When the Europeans arrived, they bagan calling the Kalinagos by the name "Carib". They also conveyed the Caribs as warlike and cannibals, which was not the truth. The europeans did that in order to justify the unjust slaughter of the natives of the islands.
How did the settler government justify the land apportionment act of1930what was its impact on white settlers and indigenous people?
the Europeans argued that they were better skilled and more civilised than the Africans and hence they [Europeans] were able to practice commercial agriculture, unlike the "subsistence" Africans. It is in this context that they apportioned the land on racial basis, consolidating their hold on 51% of the productive land. African farmers were thus forcibly evicted to unproductive Native Reserve areas which constituted only 21% of the colony. This was bolstered by the enforcement of the Land Apportionment Act in 1931. Tatenda Mazuru
How did Europeans justify slave trading?
The Europeans traded weapons for slaves with the Africans, and then the Africans just accepted that offer.
What is African Colonial historiography?
The writing of African History by non Africans especially the Europeans during the period of colonial domination is what is referred to as Colonial historiography. This was pioneered by explorers, Christian Missionaries, travelers, anthropologists and ethnographers. Most of the writings of these people were euro-centric, written in the European perspective and in most cases to justify European imposition of colonial rule. All kinds of devices were used to justify their claim over Africa including scientific explanations such as the Hamitic hypothesis. The euro-centric views emphasized European racial superiority to justify imperialist activities of Europeans in Africa. The African perspective was completely left out. In that respect the claim was made that history began only when men began to write. And since Africa had no written records before the advent of Europeans, Africa had no history before that time. And even during colonialism or its preceding years of trade, the history of Africa is equated with the activities of Europeans in Africa. This however has been debunked by African historians who have shown from both written (Arabic and Moslem sources) and oral sources that Africa indeed had a history before and during colonial period outside of their relation with Europeans.
The message of this poem was used by many europeans to justify?
colonialism and the subjugation of indigenous peoples.
Based on the excerpt how did Europeans justify settling on land that belonged to indigenous peoples?
it is because of christopher Columbus. Columbus tried to go to India but he kept going a bit straight then he thought the native Americans were Indians and the europeans found out what Columbus discovered and took over their land
What did the US use to justify its imperialism in the Pacific and Caribbean in the late 1800s?
Infantilization of indigenous peoples
What reason did Europeans use to justify the enslavement of other people?
Don't know maybe
How did Europeans justify taking people from Africa and making them slaves?
it was a chance for the slaves to become catholics.
What factors did the europeans used to justify their conquest of africa?
economics, intellectual thought, religion, and military
How did europeans use science to justify imperialism?
Europeans used science to justify imperialism through ideas such as Social Darwinism, which argued that certain races and societies were biologically superior to others. They also used anthropology to classify and rank different cultures, providing a framework to justify European domination and colonization of "lesser" societies. Additionally, Europeans used advances in technology and medicine to portray themselves as more advanced and capable of bringing progress and civilization to the "uncivilized" populations they sought to control.
How did european use social darwinism to justify empire building?
The europeans used Social Darwinism to justify their increase in emprie building with the justification that all creatures have and will still continue to evolve, and as such, there needed to be new accomodations met.
How Social Darwinism was used to justify imperialism?
Europeans believed they should conquer other lands to help those places become industrialized.
The phrase your new caught sullen people’s half devil and half child is an example of what belief that Europeans used to justify imperialism?
Scientific racism
How did the caribs get their name?
Kalinagos spoke a language called 'Cariban'. When the Europeans arrived, they bagan calling the Kalinagos by the name "Carib". They also conveyed the Caribs as warlike and cannibals, which was not the truth. The europeans did that in order to justify the unjust slaughter of the natives of the islands.
How did Europeans justify using Africans as slaves?
Europeans justified using Africans as slaves by dehumanizing them, believing they were inferior and lacking civilization. They portrayed Africans as exotic, savage, and uncivilized people who needed to be civilized through slavery. This allowed Europeans to exploit Africans for labor and economic gain without guilt.
