0
Well, honey, John Langdon wasn't exactly throwing a party in celebration of the Articles of Confederation. Let's just say he wasn't their biggest fan. Langdon thought they were about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. The man wanted a stronger central government, and those flimsy Articles just weren't cutting it for him.
What else can I help you with?
Why did colonists feel the Articles of Confederation were necessary even though the Declaration of Independence was already written?
Colonists felt the Articles of Confederation were necessary because, despite declaring independence, they needed a formal framework for governance and cooperation among the newly independent states. The Articles provided a system for managing collective issues like defense, trade, and diplomacy, which were crucial for survival and unity. Additionally, they aimed to establish a sense of legitimacy and order in the absence of British authority. The Articles served as a stepping stone towards a more structured government, highlighting the need for a balance between state and federal powers.
What did most of the delegates to the philadelphia convention feel should happen to national government powers?
Many of the delegates at the Philadelphia Convention argued for a stronger national government, as one of the weakness of the Articles of Confederation was that it created a weak national government. The Constitutional Convention was held in 1787.
Describe the debate between the federalists and the anti federalists how did each group feel about the articles of confederation central the bill of rights?
The debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists centered around the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Federalists supported a stronger central government, arguing that the Articles of Confederation were too weak to maintain order and effectively govern the nation. In contrast, Anti-Federalists favored the Articles, fearing that a strong central government would threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. The Anti-Federalists advocated for the inclusion of a Bill of Rights to protect citizens' freedoms, which ultimately influenced the ratification of the Constitution.
What do you feel are the most glaring weaknesses of the articles of confederation?
The most glaring weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation included the lack of a strong central government, which made it difficult to enforce laws or regulate commerce effectively. Additionally, Congress lacked the power to levy taxes, leading to financial instability and an inability to pay debts. The requirement of unanimous consent for amendments rendered it nearly impossible to make necessary changes, while the absence of an executive branch meant there was no effective enforcement of laws or coordination among states. These weaknesses ultimately hindered the government’s ability to respond to crises and maintain order.
How did Federalists feel about a strong central government?
After the debacle of Shay's Rebellion (another topic entirely), there was a faction favoring a stronger, more centralized government than the confederacy created by the Articles of Confederation. These eventually became called the "Federalist" Party, so called, because they favored a centralized federalgovernment. The Constitution is proof of this, as are The Federalist Papers.
One reason why the constitution convention was called?
discuss revising the Article of Confederation. (APEX)
How did George Washington feel about making a knew constitution after the Articles of Confederation?
i think he was all for it because he was the president of the constitutional convention in 1787
Why did the confederation congress call for the constitution convention?
Congress could feel that the Articles of Confederation were not working for the people of the United States, so they called a Constitutional Convention to revise the Articles to alleviate some of these problems and better unite the country through legal means. Once the delegates had convened, however, it became clear that the Articles of Confederation were never going to work for the United States, and the Constitution was written to take their place.
How did john langdon feel about slavery?
John Langdon was opposed to slavery and advocated for its abolition. He believed that slavery was morally wrong and worked towards ending it, supporting measures like the prohibition of the international slave trade. Langdon's views on slavery reflected his commitment to justice and equality for all individuals.
Why did the confederation congress call for the constitutional convention?
Congress could feel that the Articles of Confederation were not working for the people of the United States, so they called a Constitutional Convention to revise the Articles to alleviate some of these problems and better unite the country through legal means. Once the delegates had convened, however, it became clear that the Articles of Confederation were never going to work for the United States, and the Constitution was written to take their place.
Why did the men who wrote the constitution feel that the government under the Articles of Confederation was not working?
Under the Articles of Confederation the government did not have to power to levy taxes or form an army. The Articles of Confederation did not give the government enough power to function. They could only ask for the support of the states and hope they complied. In regard to taxes, nobody wanted to pay taxes, so the government had no money. Shay's Rebellion showed that the government also didn't have the power to protect the states should they need it. The Articles of Confederation were too weak because they were written with they tyranny of England fresh in the minds of the authors. They wanted to limit the power of government as much as possible and consequently created a government that couldn't function.
Why did colonists feel the Articles of Confederation were necessary even though the Declaration of Independence was already written?
Colonists felt the Articles of Confederation were necessary because, despite declaring independence, they needed a formal framework for governance and cooperation among the newly independent states. The Articles provided a system for managing collective issues like defense, trade, and diplomacy, which were crucial for survival and unity. Additionally, they aimed to establish a sense of legitimacy and order in the absence of British authority. The Articles served as a stepping stone towards a more structured government, highlighting the need for a balance between state and federal powers.
Do you feel that the diplomatic weakness of the US under the articles confederation were as its internal problems?
The Articles of Confederation left no information or authority for Congress to either regulate interstate commerce or foreign trade. It also lacked the ability to tax and raise funds or tariffs, this made the country appear weak to potential lending countries. There was also a mountain of both personal as well as war debts incurred by the government. There were also no provisions for a national bank.
How did John Hancock feel about the declaration of independence?
John Hancock was a Christian and belonged to the Congregationalist Church, which is a Protestant type religion and they believe that the Bible is sufficient in ruling their society "in matters of faith and practice". His father was a Congregationalist preacher.
How did the maritime provinces feel about confederation?
Some were in favor and some were against it.
What did most of the delegates to the philadelphia convention feel should happen to national government powers?
Many of the delegates at the Philadelphia Convention argued for a stronger national government, as one of the weakness of the Articles of Confederation was that it created a weak national government. The Constitutional Convention was held in 1787.
Describe the debate between the federalists and the anti federalists how did each group feel about the articles of confederation central the bill of rights?
The debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists centered around the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Federalists supported a stronger central government, arguing that the Articles of Confederation were too weak to maintain order and effectively govern the nation. In contrast, Anti-Federalists favored the Articles, fearing that a strong central government would threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. The Anti-Federalists advocated for the inclusion of a Bill of Rights to protect citizens' freedoms, which ultimately influenced the ratification of the Constitution.
