Thomas Hobbes described the 'natural state' of human beings as solitary, nasty, brutish, and short. In the absence of social order and the additional protective layer of morality, 'natural' human interactions were, for Hobbes, war-like and bloody, with each waging hostilities against all others for the sake of basic, and usually only temporary, security.
Hobbes' Law of Nature is rooted in a pessimistic view of human nature, emphasizing self-preservation and the need for a social contract to escape the chaos of the state of nature. In contrast, St. Thomas Aquinas' Natural Law is grounded in a more optimistic view, asserting that human beings can discern moral truths through reason, which reflects divine order and promotes the common good. While Hobbes focuses on individual survival and the necessity of authority, Aquinas emphasizes moral principles inherent in human nature that guide ethical behavior. Thus, Hobbes sees law as a means to avoid conflict, while Aquinas views it as a reflection of a higher moral order.
people have natural rights as human beings
Godlike beings
They are human beings.
the Greeks believe the god give two gifts fro all human beings and also naturual beings. thery are fire and air,man is very sofisticated in all beings,the god made especially for his ony worship,so the reason the god made earth and the human beings
Nasty, brutish and short
Thomas Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes believed that humans were naturally selfish, competitive, and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that in a state of nature, without government or authority to keep them in check, humans would be in a constant state of war with one another.
Thomas Hobbes believed that human beings were naturally selfish, competitive, and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that in a state of nature, without a strong central authority, human life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short."
Hobbes described the state of nature as a condition of war of all against all, where life was "nasty, brutish, and short." In this state, individuals acted solely in their own self-interest, leading to constant conflict and insecurity. To escape this chaos, Hobbes argued for a social contract to establish a sovereign authority to maintain peace and order.
I'm sure there were others both before him and after him who aruged the same question, but I know that Thomas Hobbes was one that argued it.
John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both were political philosophers who explored the concept of social contract. However, they had differing views on human nature. Hobbes believed that humans are inherently selfish and require a strong central authority to prevent chaos, while Locke argued that humans are rational beings with natural rights and should have a say in their government.
A 17th century philosopher and educator, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) has long been famous for his pithy yet unflattering description of the natural state (or, "state of nature") of human beings as "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." He argued further that human life outside of civilization is an ongoing war of all against all.
Thomas Hobbes's most important idea was his concept of the social contract, where individuals surrender some of their freedoms to the government in exchange for protection and order. He also believed in the necessity of a strong central authority to maintain peace and prevent chaos. Additionally, Hobbes argued that human beings are inherently self-interested and driven by a desire for power, which leads to a constant state of conflict without government intervention.
Hobbes described the state of nature as a condition of war of every man against every man, where life was solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. In this state, there was no common power to keep individuals in check, leading to a constant state of conflict and insecurity. Hobbes believed that to escape this state of nature, individuals must enter into a social contract to form a commonwealth with a sovereign authority.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both influential political philosophers who lived during the 17th century. They both believed in the importance of social contracts and the role of government in protecting individual rights. Additionally, they both emphasized the need for a stable and orderly society, although they had different views on the nature of human beings and the best form of government.
Thomas Hobbes, a philosopher, proposed the idea that human beings are inherently selfish and brutal in his work "Leviathan" published in 1651. He argued that without a strong government to control human impulses, society would descend into chaos and violence.