answersLogoWhite

0

The Treaty of Versaillies reeked havoc on Germany. The government was too weak to deal with it, so more and more people turned to th Fascist Party, also know as the NSDAP and the Nazi Party, because it seemed strong enough to fix Germany.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What did Francisco Franco have to do with Appeasement before the second world war?

Francisco Franco, the leader of Spain during the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), was indirectly related to the policy of appeasement as his regime received significant support from Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. This support was part of a broader strategy by these powers to expand their influence in Europe and undermine democratic governments, which aligned with the appeasement policies of Western democracies towards fascist aggression. Franco’s victory in the civil war further emboldened fascist regimes and highlighted the failures of appeasement, as it demonstrated the consequences of allowing authoritarian regimes to expand unchecked. After the war, Franco's Spain remained neutral, but his ideological alignment with Axis powers reflected the underlying tensions and conflicts of the appeasement era.


How did France and Britain respond to the fascist aggression in the 1930?

In the 1930s, France and Britain initially responded to fascist aggression, particularly from Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, with a policy of appeasement, hoping to avoid another devastating conflict. Notably, they allowed the remilitarization of the Rhineland in 1936 and the annexation of Austria in 1938 without significant intervention. However, as aggression escalated, culminating in the invasion of Poland in 1939, both nations ultimately abandoned appeasement and declared war on Germany, marking the beginning of World War II. Their earlier inaction, however, was criticized for emboldening fascist leaders and exacerbating the conflict.


Why did Hitler send aid to help the Nationalists Spanish Civil War?

Hitler was fascist. The Spanish rebels were fascist. They got along. Same reason he supported Mussolini.


What was more effective appeasement or collective security?

The lessons of Munich in 1938, The Molotov-Ribbentrop (Nazi-Soviet) Pact, and Indian appeasement to the People's Republic of China in the run-up to the Sino-Indian War are textbook examples of the failing of appeasement. Collective security as evidenced by the successful NATO model instrumental to European security since its founding proved an effective deterrent to Soviet expansion into Western Europe in contrast.


What policy did Britain and France adopt toward Hitler before World War 2?

AppeasementThe policy of appeasement.

Related Questions

What policy did Britain and France follow against Fascist aggression?

appeasement


How did France and Britain respond to the fascist aggression during the 1930?

Appeasement until 3 September 1939 when they both declared war on Germany.


What did Francisco Franco have to do with Appeasement before the second world war?

Francisco Franco, the leader of Spain during the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), was indirectly related to the policy of appeasement as his regime received significant support from Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. This support was part of a broader strategy by these powers to expand their influence in Europe and undermine democratic governments, which aligned with the appeasement policies of Western democracies towards fascist aggression. Franco’s victory in the civil war further emboldened fascist regimes and highlighted the failures of appeasement, as it demonstrated the consequences of allowing authoritarian regimes to expand unchecked. After the war, Franco's Spain remained neutral, but his ideological alignment with Axis powers reflected the underlying tensions and conflicts of the appeasement era.


How did France and Britain respond to fascist aggression during 1930?

Appeasement until 3 September 1939 when they both declared war on Germany.


What Appeasement proved a poor strategy for slowing German expansion because?

Germany immediately broke agreements to give up expansion in exchange for land


How did France and Britain respond to the fascist aggression in the 1930?

In the 1930s, France and Britain initially responded to fascist aggression, particularly from Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, with a policy of appeasement, hoping to avoid another devastating conflict. Notably, they allowed the remilitarization of the Rhineland in 1936 and the annexation of Austria in 1938 without significant intervention. However, as aggression escalated, culminating in the invasion of Poland in 1939, both nations ultimately abandoned appeasement and declared war on Germany, marking the beginning of World War II. Their earlier inaction, however, was criticized for emboldening fascist leaders and exacerbating the conflict.


Why did Hitler send aid to help the Nationalists Spanish Civil War?

Hitler was fascist. The Spanish rebels were fascist. They got along. Same reason he supported Mussolini.


The policy of appeasement was based upon the assumption that Germany?

...that Germany would feel satisfied with its gains, and not seek any more territorial expansion.


Why did Germany ally with japan?

The goals of the two countries complemented each other. They were both fascist dictatorships that believed in imperial expansion.


What is the policy of giving into Hitler's demands?

Appeasement.


Why did Britain France and the US stop fascist aggression in the 1930s?

The policy that France and Britain pursued against aggressive nations during the 1930s is known as appeasement. It is a policy of granting concessions to a potential enemy in the hope that it will maintain peace.


How did appeasement lead to WW2?

Appeasement, particularly by Britain and France towards Nazi Germany in the 1930s, allowed Hitler to expand German territory and military power unchecked. The Munich Agreement of 1938, which permitted the annexation of the Sudetenland, exemplified this policy, as Western powers believed it would prevent a larger conflict. However, this strategy emboldened Hitler, leading to further aggression, including the invasion of Poland in 1939, which ultimately triggered World War II. The failure to confront fascist expansionism highlighted the inadequacies of appeasement and its catastrophic consequences.