The lessons of Munich in 1938, The Molotov-Ribbentrop (Nazi-Soviet) Pact, and Indian appeasement to the People's Republic of China in the run-up to the Sino-Indian War are textbook examples of the failing of appeasement. Collective security as evidenced by the successful NATO model instrumental to European security since its founding proved an effective deterrent to Soviet expansion into Western Europe in contrast.
Bad. it just makes leaders want more and more and more.
According to some, appeasement was reasonable because Great Britain and France were in no shape to fight another war with Germany. The only other option was appeasement, which allowed Germany to take control of the Sudetenland. Some say that it encouraged Germany to demand even more, but to most officials in France and Great Britain, appeasement was the most reasonable solution.
appeasement: the policy of avoiding disagreement by accepting an enemy's demands how Germany used it: at the start of WWII, Hitler "tested the waters" by taking little bits of land that he was not supposed to take. using appeasement, the enemies of Germany let him have the land so the could avoid a war (which obviously didnt work) and so Hitler kept taking more and more land and eventually he got so powerful that we couldn't stop him for a long time. =D hope this helped.
There are virtually no more collective farms in North Korea. Severe droughts and famine in the 1990s completely dismantled the entire system.
Retribution can be effective if the person is willing to admit a mistake and improve following the retribution. In most cases, rehabilitation is more effective.
Collective security was ultimately the more effective response to aggression before World War II, as it aimed to unite nations against acts of aggression through mutual defense agreements. However, the failure of the League of Nations and the lack of commitment from major powers weakened this approach. In contrast, appeasement, particularly by Britain and France towards Nazi Germany, emboldened aggressive states and allowed them to expand unchecked, leading to the war. Thus, while both strategies were employed, collective security had the potential for effectiveness that was undermined by the failures of appeasement.
Appeasement in today's society may not be effective due to the complexities of global politics and the heightened awareness of human rights issues. While it can temporarily ease tensions, it often emboldens aggressors and undermines long-term stability. Modern communication and social media also mean that actions are scrutinized more than ever, making it difficult for governments to justify concessions. Ultimately, a balance of diplomacy and firm stances is likely more effective than outright appeasement.
A policy of appeasement often encourages even more demands.
To do what? Chanting is an effective way of providing the calm needed for meditation, and for collective prayer. Anything more specific would need more details.
A computer system is faster and more effective when used to pay the social security benefits.
It encouraged more agression
The policy of appeasement refers to Hitler saying at the Munich conference that he would not invade any more of Europe after Czechoslovakia. It failed, obviously.
Bad. it just makes leaders want more and more and more.
Terrible. It just creates more terrorism. Appeasement helps the enemy. References http://www.americansolvent.com/2009/07/05/appeasement-and-why-it-doesnt-work/
A collective block in volleyball refers to a defensive maneuver where two or more players jump together to block an opponent's attack. This coordinated effort aims to increase the height and coverage of the block, making it more challenging for the attacking player to score. Effective communication and timing are crucial for a successful collective block, as players must synchronize their movements to maximize their chances of deflecting the ball.
It encouraged more agression
Security alarms are a valuable component of a home security system, but they work best when used in combination with other measures such as motion-sensor lighting, sturdy locks, and surveillance cameras. A comprehensive security approach that includes multiple layers of protection is typically more effective in deterring criminals and protecting homes.