The feelings of each social class towards the czar and government in Russia varied significantly. The nobility often supported the czar as a means to maintain their privileges and power, although some sought reforms to modernize the state. The middle class generally favored constitutional reforms and greater political participation, expressing frustration over autocratic rule. Meanwhile, the peasantry and working class were largely disillusioned, suffering under oppressive conditions and often viewing the czar as a symbol of their struggles, leading to widespread unrest and revolutionary sentiments.
They were different becuase each class did something different
William Graham Sumner believed that social classes do not owe anything to each other. He argued that individuals should be responsible for their own success or failure, and that government intervention and redistribution of wealth were unjust. Sumner believed that society should operate according to the principles of free market capitalism and that social class divisions were natural and necessary.
They were a chiefdom with a ruling class and a common class. The mounds were topped by temples and residences of the ruling class. Upon the death of a ruler, the residence would be burned as a cleansing and afterwards the deceased would be buried in a new layer of clay atop the previous mound.
Ancient Egypt's social class structure was known as a hierarchy, often depicted as a pyramid. At the top was the pharaoh, considered a divine ruler, followed by nobles, priests, scribes, artisans, and farmers at the base. This system was based on factors such as wealth, occupation, and proximity to the pharaoh, with each class having distinct roles and responsibilities in society. Social mobility was limited, but individuals could rise through merit, particularly in roles like administration or military service.
Tsar Nicholas II and Tsarina Alexandra were equally devoted to each other, their marriage was a true love match.
Which social class? Ancient Rome's society was divided into several classes as it was part of their culture. Each person knew his class and the social mores that their class incorporated.
contrast the social contract theory of government with the divine right theory. what type of government would result from each theory?
They were different becuase each class did something different
i don't know that's why I'm asking
There job specializations were farmers, farmer workers, church workers, warriors, etc. The Social class was working class, social class, and the middle class.
The modern social concept of personal rights and freedoms did not exist back at that time.
Dictator,czar,and emperor are each a type of autocrat.
Social Security Taxes
Yes each state can make their own policies for education and social services as can the Federal Government.
Dharma is the Vedic concept of duty in the social hierarchy in the social class to perform ones work in this life in the caste born in .A priests duty is to perform his religious task,a soldiers duty is to defend his country,a kings task is to look into the welfare of his subject.
William Graham Sumner believed that social classes do not owe anything to each other. He argued that individuals should be responsible for their own success or failure, and that government intervention and redistribution of wealth were unjust. Sumner believed that society should operate according to the principles of free market capitalism and that social class divisions were natural and necessary.
The social classes of the Philippines are typically classified into five main categories: the upper class, the middle class, the working class, the lower class, and the poorest of the poor. Each class is defined by factors such as income level, education, occupation, and lifestyle. There is also a growing number of Filipinos who do not fit neatly into these categories, leading to a more diversified social structure.