very well. :) they were easy and they "mowed" down enemy
Um I think I can give a more detailed answer. Because of the machine guns, soldiers were not able to Dodge bullets. Consequently this led to them doing the only thing they could do- dig down and dig trenches. This led to the infamous trench warfare where more men died from disease than from battle. From trench warfare new deadly gases (like tear gas etc...) were developed in order to kill the men in the trenches.
Actually rifles already had that affect on the war but machine guns helped the cause a lot. They would kill more people and it would take less time.
World War I was dominated by trench warfare for one reason: it was effective in stopping the enemy's attacks. That is to say, defensive technology and tactics were, during this conflict, far more effective than offensive technology and tactics. It would not be until World War II that offensive developments broke through the trench-warfare deadlock.
Autocratic, top-down, he was somewhat conservative ( being A World War I Luftwaffe vet)- and tended to oppose new tactics among the airmen- such as spread out formations, defensive pursuit ( like Flying Tigers), and so on. He did not oppose the German Jets, but tended to be conservative in fighting tactics in the Luftwaffe, which was his domain.
NO - it wasnt a defensive war on Germanys part. PART of what started it was that Hitler wanted more land. Then of course the destruction of the Jews, which is what is focused on in today's history teaching (with good reason). Hitler was greedy and a mental basket case.
All the armies in WW1 used it. By the early 1900's machine guns had become standard in the world's armies. However, machine guns of that time were heavy and best suited to a defensive role, and Germany used them most effectively in this way.
During World War I, machine guns played a crucial role on the battlefield. Their impact was significant and multifaceted: Defensive Power: Machine guns were highly effective in defensive positions. They could deliver a continuous stream of bullets, making it extremely difficult for enemy forces to advance. This led to the entrenchment of armies and contributed to the prolonged stalemates and trench warfare that characterized much of the Western Front. Trench Warfare: The ability of machine guns to create "killing zones" in no-man's land made trench warfare particularly deadly. Soldiers faced heavy casualties as they attempted to cross these areas under constant fire, which often resulted in high death tolls and attrition. Psychological Impact: The sheer firepower and constant noise of machine guns had a demoralizing effect on troops. The fear of being mowed down by machine gun fire contributed to the overall stress and psychological strain experienced by soldiers. Tactical Changes: The use of machine guns forced changes in military tactics. Armies had to adapt by developing new strategies for infantry assault, including the use of artillery barrages to suppress machine gun positions before advancing. Technological Evolution: The experiences of World War I spurred advancements in machine gun technology and tactics. The war saw improvements in the design and deployment of machine guns, which continued to evolve throughout the conflict and beyond. Overall, machine guns were a game-changer in World War I, significantly altering the nature of warfare and contributing to the high casualty rates and the grueling conditions faced by soldiers.
They were a powerfull defensive weapon.
A lot of death and tactics change.
Football is a world wide sport. The sport requires physical and mental fitness. Tactics are everywhere in every position in football, including the goalkeeper. Full backs require the most of the tactics as they play the most defensive and offensive!
Weapons and attics used during World War 1 affect a lot of number of deaths. I mean with the technology of tanks that were very harmful. Also machine guns that could fire fast and kill a lot of people. Also aircraft that dropped explosive stuff.
Artillery and machine guns caused armies to stay in defensive positions.
Artillery and machine guns caused armies to stay in defensive positions. Apex.
Artillery and machine guns caused armies to stay in defensive positions.
World War I was dominated by trench warfare for one reason: it was effective in stopping the enemy's attacks. That is to say, defensive technology and tactics were, during this conflict, far more effective than offensive technology and tactics. It would not be until World War II that offensive developments broke through the trench-warfare deadlock.
During World War I, the vast majority of the battles on the Western Front led to stalemates for one fundamental reason: offensive technology and tactics were outdated and ineffective, while defensive technology and tactics were advanced and effective. It would not be until World War II that the offense would again overtake the defense on battlefields.
The machine guns were the most affective defensive weapons in world war one because they could fire 500 bullets in a minute. There for the enemy couldn't attack because they would be mowed down by the machine gun fire.
Autocratic, top-down, he was somewhat conservative ( being A World War I Luftwaffe vet)- and tended to oppose new tactics among the airmen- such as spread out formations, defensive pursuit ( like Flying Tigers), and so on. He did not oppose the German Jets, but tended to be conservative in fighting tactics in the Luftwaffe, which was his domain.
NO - it wasnt a defensive war on Germanys part. PART of what started it was that Hitler wanted more land. Then of course the destruction of the Jews, which is what is focused on in today's history teaching (with good reason). Hitler was greedy and a mental basket case.