Shay's rebellion was during the time the States were under the Articles of Confederation the Federal Government was not existent until the Constitution.
Well it is true
SUCKER...... i want to know too
Shay's rebellion showed how Congress was unable to organize a military.
The Whiskey Rebellion ended differently than Shays' Rebellion primarily due to the response from the federal government. In 1794, President George Washington led a militia to suppress the Whiskey Rebellion in Pennsylvania, demonstrating the federal government's ability and willingness to enforce its laws. In contrast, Shays' Rebellion in 1786-1787 was largely met with state-level resistance, and the lack of a strong federal response highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. Ultimately, the resolution of the Whiskey Rebellion reinforced federal authority, while Shays' Rebellion spurred calls for a stronger national government, leading to the Constitutional Convention.
Daniel Shays (Shays's Rebellion)
the new federal government
Well it is true
SUCKER...... i want to know too
SUCKER...... i want to know too
the united states did not have enough arsenals
It began the growth of the federal government.
Shay's rebellion showed how Congress was unable to organize a military.
Yes, both the Whiskey Rebellion and Shays' Rebellion ultimately strengthened the federal government. The government's response to these uprisings demonstrated its ability to maintain order and enforce laws, thereby enhancing its authority. The successful suppression of the Whiskey Rebellion, in particular, affirmed the federal government's right to levy taxes, while Shays' Rebellion highlighted the need for a stronger national framework, leading to the Constitutional Convention and the creation of a more robust federal system.
The Whiskey Rebellion ended differently than Shays' Rebellion primarily due to the response from the federal government. In 1794, President George Washington led a militia to suppress the Whiskey Rebellion in Pennsylvania, demonstrating the federal government's ability and willingness to enforce its laws. In contrast, Shays' Rebellion in 1786-1787 was largely met with state-level resistance, and the lack of a strong federal response highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. Ultimately, the resolution of the Whiskey Rebellion reinforced federal authority, while Shays' Rebellion spurred calls for a stronger national government, leading to the Constitutional Convention.
Shays' Rebellion led some to the believe that the U.S. Constitution should create a more powerful federal government. The rebellion was led in part by Daniel Shays.
Daniel Shays (Shays's Rebellion)
The articles of condederation were inadequate and we marveled a powelful federal government.