0
The Romans got their resources from around the Roman Empire and beyond.
The most important resource was grain which was needed to feed Rome's enormous population. Egypt supplied half of this. Other major producers were Tunisia, Sicily and Sardinia.
Spain exported gold, silver and other metals, olive oil, timber and horses. Gaul exported glass, wine and wool. Britannia exported metals and wool. Turkey and Syria exported timber, wool, olive oil, wine and horses. Greece exported manufactures. Egypt exported cotton, linen, papyrus, ivory, gemstones, ebony, ostrich feathers, leopard skins, lions, leopards and elephants.
Roman trade also reached Arabia, which exported incense and spices, Persia which acted as an intermediary for the trade with China and India. China, exported silk, and India exported spices, herbs, sesame oil, sugar, limes, peaches, ebony, pearls and wild animals (tigers, rhinos, elephants, and snakes which were used for circus-type animal acts).There was also trade with Ethiopia which exported ebony and ivory.
What else can I help you with?
What did the Romans gain by conquering regions?
The Romans gained territory and resources by conquering regions.
What natural resources did the Romans have access to and how did they utilize them in their empire-building efforts?
The Romans had access to resources like timber, metals, and fertile land. They used these resources to build roads, aqueducts, and buildings, as well as to support their agriculture and mining industries. These resources played a crucial role in the expansion and development of the Roman Empire.
What did the Romans call the Netherlands?
The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.
Did the poor Romans have butter?
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
Did the Romans had televisions?
Ancient Romans. No
What did the Romans gain by conquering regions?
The Romans gained territory and resources by conquering regions.
What natural resources did the Romans have access to and how did they utilize them in their empire-building efforts?
The Romans had access to resources like timber, metals, and fertile land. They used these resources to build roads, aqueducts, and buildings, as well as to support their agriculture and mining industries. These resources played a crucial role in the expansion and development of the Roman Empire.
Why did the Romans built forts and cities near water?
it is close to fish resources
What resources did the Romans take from their conquered lands in north Africa?
For the most part it was human capital.
Was queen Cleopatra evil?
No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.
Why did the Romans need a number system?
Same reasons we do * Trade * Supplying people with resources (eg food for the army) * Building ... and so on
Why was Spain important to the Romans?
Spain was important to the Romans for three main reasons. It was used by the Romans for troop recruitment. Caesar's famous Tenth Legion was mostly recruited from Spain, along with his Ninth. The Spanish terrain was also good for training troops. Spain also produced a great quantity of olive oil, and had metal resources.
What resources contributed to the wealth of Axum?
The Kingdom of Aksum did some major trading with the Romans and Ancient India, also,æthey were a hub of commerce. And, they minted their own currency.
What did the Romans call London?
The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".
How long did Romans have kings?
The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.
What did the Romans call the Netherlands?
The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.
Did the poor Romans have butter?
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
