Thomas, although he was Henry's close friend, refused to let him change the rules.
The church courts were perceived as unfair to Thomas Becket and Henry II due to their preferential treatment of clergy members over laypersons, leading to tension between church and state. Becket, as the Archbishop of Canterbury, often prioritized ecclesiastical law, which conflicted with royal authority, causing a power struggle. Furthermore, the church courts' ability to absolve clergy from civil penalties undermined the king's legal authority, fueling grievances from Henry regarding the perceived lack of accountability for church officials. This clash ultimately culminated in Becket's murder, highlighting the extreme tensions between Henry's desire for control and the church's insistence on its own autonomy.
When Thomas Becket came back to England, he refused to forgive the King's followers and excommunicated them (banished them from the Church).
Thomas Becket opposed King Henry II of England over questions relating to the relative importance of the Church and the Monarchy.
Henry II and Thomas Becket fell out. (IDK what that means, but it was on a historical paper...)
Henry chose Becket as archbishop because he was his friend and he did not like the way that they didn't get punished. because Becket was his friend he thought that he could change the church rules but he was wrong. Becket him self changed himself and he was determined to be a really good archbishop.
Thomas Becket refused to sign the Constitutions of Clarendon which restricted ecclesiastical privileges and curbed the power of the Church courts and the extent of Papal authority in England.
Becket was made a saint, Henry II repented, and the Church remained independent of the state, tax free, and able to run its own courts.
The church courts were perceived as unfair to Thomas Becket and Henry II due to their preferential treatment of clergy members over laypersons, leading to tension between church and state. Becket, as the Archbishop of Canterbury, often prioritized ecclesiastical law, which conflicted with royal authority, causing a power struggle. Furthermore, the church courts' ability to absolve clergy from civil penalties undermined the king's legal authority, fueling grievances from Henry regarding the perceived lack of accountability for church officials. This clash ultimately culminated in Becket's murder, highlighting the extreme tensions between Henry's desire for control and the church's insistence on its own autonomy.
he never did. for some reason, everyone just calls him it. :)
When Thomas Becket came back to England, he refused to forgive the King's followers and excommunicated them (banished them from the Church).
Because he wanted all the church to his side
Thomas Becket opposed King Henry II of England over questions relating to the relative importance of the Church and the Monarchy.
The quarrel was over the fact that if a clergyman ( person who worked for the church ) commited ed a crime they would go before the church court. The penalties in the church courts were very moderate e.g. if a clergyman commited murder he would be sent on a pilgrimage were as a normal man would be hung. Henry II thought this unfair so appointed Thomas a Becket as archbishop of Canterbury in the hope that Becket would help him. The plan backfired and Becket soon turned to the Church's side thus resulting in the quarrel.
Henry II and Thomas Becket fell out. (IDK what that means, but it was on a historical paper...)
Archbishop Thomas Becket was one of two archbishops in England. He was therefore at the very top rank of the Church in this country, but as a member of the Church he was not part of the feudal system directly.
Archbishop thomas becket
The church's would of united