Under the Articles of Confederation, the national government did not have the power to raise a standing army directly. Instead, it relied on the states to provide soldiers when needed, often through a system of voluntary enlistment or by calling upon state militias. The federal government could request troops from the states, but it had limited authority to enforce these requests, making it challenging to maintain a consistent military force. This reliance on state militias reflected the overall weakness of the national government under the Articles.
The national debt inherited from the Confederation, following the American Revolutionary War, was approximately $75 million. This debt resulted from loans taken to finance the war and obligations to soldiers and foreign creditors. The inability of the Confederation government to effectively manage this debt highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, ultimately leading to calls for a stronger federal government and the drafting of the U.S. Constitution.
they sucked the power
The articles were established on the basis of peace and did not allowe congress to create a national army
Basically, the Founding Fathers wanted a new constitution because the government under the Articles of Confederation proved to be unstable and inefficient. The document provided very little structure in terms of a federal government. Each state used their own currency and there was little unity. Finally, with Shay's rebellion in Massachusetts and no standing army to counteract it, the Founding Fathers came to the conclusion that a new government and constitution needed to be drawn up which would give America a stronger federal government while still preserving state's rights. More input from FAQ Farmers: * The Founding Fathers wanted a new constitution because the current government of the Articles of Confederation was not working due to the balance of powers between state and federal governments. The document gave state governments too much power and left the federal government helpless in both defending and caring for American interests. This eventually led to almost no unification of the states. Two parties emerged. The federalists, who lobbied for a strong central government, and the anti-federalists who emphasized state and individual rights. The two parties compromised and worked together to ratify the new Constitution that granted more power to a federal government and granted less power (but still protected) to the states. * After the Shay's Rebellion, the Fouding Fathers realized how weak the Articles of Confederation was. The federal government was powerless to stop the rebellion and Congress had little power. Some weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation included that was no chief executive, Congress had no power to tax citizens directly, no power to draft an army, had no national court system, no power to settle arguments among states, and many more. This led to the Constitutional Convention (started by Alex Hamilton), where the AoC was scrapped and a new constitution was written.
The power to make war the power to make peace power to conduct foreigh policy power to run a post office power to ....the state for money, soldiers power to borrow money power to print money
The national debt inherited from the Confederation, following the American Revolutionary War, was approximately $75 million. This debt resulted from loans taken to finance the war and obligations to soldiers and foreign creditors. The inability of the Confederation government to effectively manage this debt highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, ultimately leading to calls for a stronger federal government and the drafting of the U.S. Constitution.
they sucked the power
The Articles of Confederation created a one-house legislature as the Confederation's main institution, making the government a unicameral system of government. In addition, Congress could settle conflicts among the states, issue coins, borrow money, and make treaties with other countries and with Native Americans. Congress could also ask the states for money and soldiers.
the government couldn't afford a strong army; therefore, the more wealthy people had to pay soldiers to fight off the farmers in shay's rebellion.
The articles were established on the basis of peace and did not allowe congress to create a national army
1 The national government could not force the states to obey its laws.2 It did not have the power to tax3 It did not have the power to enforce laws
Basically, the Founding Fathers wanted a new constitution because the government under the Articles of Confederation proved to be unstable and inefficient. The document provided very little structure in terms of a federal government. Each state used their own currency and there was little unity. Finally, with Shay's rebellion in Massachusetts and no standing army to counteract it, the Founding Fathers came to the conclusion that a new government and constitution needed to be drawn up which would give America a stronger federal government while still preserving state's rights. More input from FAQ Farmers: * The Founding Fathers wanted a new constitution because the current government of the Articles of Confederation was not working due to the balance of powers between state and federal governments. The document gave state governments too much power and left the federal government helpless in both defending and caring for American interests. This eventually led to almost no unification of the states. Two parties emerged. The federalists, who lobbied for a strong central government, and the anti-federalists who emphasized state and individual rights. The two parties compromised and worked together to ratify the new Constitution that granted more power to a federal government and granted less power (but still protected) to the states. * After the Shay's Rebellion, the Fouding Fathers realized how weak the Articles of Confederation was. The federal government was powerless to stop the rebellion and Congress had little power. Some weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation included that was no chief executive, Congress had no power to tax citizens directly, no power to draft an army, had no national court system, no power to settle arguments among states, and many more. This led to the Constitutional Convention (started by Alex Hamilton), where the AoC was scrapped and a new constitution was written.
This is a very good question... *First the articals of confederation could not tax the people. It could only request funds from that states *Second that articals did not set a national currency, meaning that each state had its own money.(So their could be North Carolina Quarters and Virginia Dollars) ... and know you know.
Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was a unicameral meaning it had only one house with one member from each state. To pass any legislation, 9 out of 13 members were needed. Congress could not levy taxes or even regulate trade among the states. They did not even had the power to draft soldiers. The Articles were drawn up during the war. Problems after the war could not be solved by the Articles. Not only Congress had limited power but the President had no power at all.
In the articles of confederation, congress could not force states to provide soldiers for an army, this made it more difficult to protect its citizens against foreign threats. Congress tried to make an agreement with spain about keeping the Mississippi river, however it was not ratified, if the us had a strong military, Spanish might have negotatiaged.
In 1787, Shays' Rebellion was led by Daniel Shays and a group of disgruntled farmers and former soldiers in Massachusetts. They protested against economic injustices and the lack of government response to their financial struggles by attempting to seize a government arsenal in Springfield. The rebellion highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and contributed to the calls for a stronger federal government, ultimately leading to the Constitutional Convention.
Shay's Rebellion was caused because farmers/former soldiers hadn't gotten paid for their services and didn't have enough money to pay off the taxes that were levied on them. Many were put in prison because they couldn't pay off the debt from taxes. Daniel Shay organized farmers and other men who thought that their interests weren't being protected and led them to the court, which they hoped to close down. The former soldiers had been and were still being tried at the courts that Shay and his men were closing down. Shay and his men were also able to raid the federal arsenal. That told people interested in the topic and researchers that back in that time that the government didn't even have enough money to pay for security for the arsenal. The National Government couldn't get money from the States under the Article of Confederation. Shay's Rebellion was significant and important because it made people realize that the Articles of Confederation wasn't working well and wasn't supporting the needs and wants of the new citizens.