He did so in 1642 when the English Civil War started
to not be criticised
He got money and troops from France.
I think it is because Charles I wanted to rule without parliament for a while and he married a Catholic Princess when most of his country were Protestants.
In a nutshell - Charles I believed in the Divine Right of Kings and wanted to rule as an 'absolute monarch'. Basically this means that he believed Parliament existed to serve him. Because Parliament believed differently, that the King ruled with Parliament and was not above the laws of the land, Charles and Parliament would clash and Charles would end up dismissing Parliament and trying to rule without them. A bit difficult to do, since Parliament held the purse strings. Charles would use what ever means he could find to raise money without having to recall Parliament, means that weren't always legal or ethical. In the end, when he was finally forced to call a Parliament, they turned on him; Charles tried to evict them, they refused to leave, he called an army and the Civil War began. In the end, Charles lost his head, his family went on the run and Cromwell ruled the country as dictator for several years.
with no parliament
Reign of Charles I. 1625-1649, reign of Charles II. 1649-1685. Christoph
to not be criticised
King Charles I
He got money and troops from France.
I think it is because Charles I wanted to rule without parliament for a while and he married a Catholic Princess when most of his country were Protestants.
with parliament control
In a nutshell - Charles I believed in the Divine Right of Kings and wanted to rule as an 'absolute monarch'. Basically this means that he believed Parliament existed to serve him. Because Parliament believed differently, that the King ruled with Parliament and was not above the laws of the land, Charles and Parliament would clash and Charles would end up dismissing Parliament and trying to rule without them. A bit difficult to do, since Parliament held the purse strings. Charles would use what ever means he could find to raise money without having to recall Parliament, means that weren't always legal or ethical. In the end, when he was finally forced to call a Parliament, they turned on him; Charles tried to evict them, they refused to leave, he called an army and the Civil War began. In the end, Charles lost his head, his family went on the run and Cromwell ruled the country as dictator for several years.
with no parliament
King Charles I was a High Church Anglican, while some Parliamentary leaders were Puritans; this was a source of conflict. Charles also attempted to rule without Parliament.
In 1640, King Charles I of England faced significant turmoil due to his attempts to rule without Parliament and impose taxes without consent. His actions sparked widespread discontent, leading to the Short Parliament in April, which he abruptly dissolved when they refused to grant him funds. Later that year, the Long Parliament convened, leading to escalating tensions that ultimately contributed to the outbreak of the English Civil War in 1642. Charles's authoritarian rule and failure to address grievances fueled conflicts between the monarchy and Parliament.
The 11 years of closed Parliament in England, from 1629 to 1640, is referred to as the "Personal Rule" of King Charles I. During this period, Charles ruled without calling Parliament, leading to increased tensions between the monarchy and Parliament. His attempts to govern without parliamentary consent and impose taxes contributed to the eventual outbreak of the English Civil War. This period ended with the "Short Parliament" being convened in 1640.
The period from 1629 to 1640 when King Charles I ruled without Parliament is often referred to as the "Personal Rule" or "Eleven Years' Tyranny." During this time, Charles sought to govern unilaterally, enforcing his policies and taxes without parliamentary consent, which ultimately contributed to rising tensions that led to the English Civil War.