answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How might the theory of states' rights undermine the federal government?

poop


What rights did the states keep under the federal system of government?

The states were given all powers not delegated to the federal government in the Constitution. However, there are implied powers that the federal government can use.


What are the rights and powers independent of the federal government that are reserved for the states by the constitution called?

Any of the rights that are not already reserved by the constitution for the federal government.


What issue did Daniel Webster and John Calhoun disagree on?

Calhoun believed in the expansion of states' rights over the federal government and Webster believed in the federal government more than the states' rights.


What is the principle that the rights of individual states should prevail over the rights of the federal government?

The idea is called "states rights".


What is the principle of federalism and how does it relate to the concept that rights not given to the federal government are rights given to the states?

Federalism is the principle of dividing power between a central government and individual states. It means that certain powers are given to the federal government, while others are reserved for the states. This concept ensures that rights not specifically granted to the federal government in the Constitution are retained by the states.


What was related to the issue of states' rights?

The Kentucky and Virginia resolutions.It is the U.S. state governments that were related to the issue of states rights, and not the federal government.


The right of states to limit the power of the federal government is states rights?

1st admendment


How do President Jackson stood up for the rights of states but acted forcefully to protect?

He acted to protect the authority of the federal government.


What are four rights given to states?

There are no rights 'given' to states. States instead have given the federal government certain rights. All others remain with the state.


Does allowing a state to take an action that opposed federal law undermine the federal government?

this question is an opinion question. the fact that the federal government can ever feel undermined my a state's decision means that the federal government is indeed not supreme and the supremacy clause should be defined unsupported. But alas that is not the case so my answer is that since the supremacy lies within the federal govt any decision that states make that opposes the federal govt does not undermine the federal, however, allows the states to use their reserved powers that given to them in the constitution in the tenth amendment.


What is states rights?

States rights is allocation of power to the states relative to the federal government. If you give too much power to the states: They become 50 bickering despotisms If you give too much power to the federal govt: We have a Dictatorship