The Revolt of 1857, also known as the Sepoy Mutiny, significantly altered British policy towards Indian states by leading to the dissolution of the British East India Company's rule and the establishment of direct British governance over India. The uprising exposed the vulnerabilities of British control and prompted a shift towards a more conciliatory approach, which included recognizing and preserving the autonomy of certain princely states. The British adopted policies aimed at securing loyalty and stability, including reforms in administration and land revenue systems, while also employing a strategy of divide-and-rule to prevent further unrest. Ultimately, the revolt marked a turning point in British colonial policy, emphasizing direct control and the importance of maintaining relationships with Indian rulers.
1. End of the rule of the Company2. Alteration In the British Policy towards the Indian States3. Conclusion of Peshwaship4. End of the Mughal Rule5. The Army was reorganized6. India was economically exploited7. Nationalism began to rise8. Introduction of Policy of Divide and Rule The impact of the Revolt :9. End of the rule of the Company10. Alteration in the British Policy towards the Indian States11. Conclusion of Peshwaship12. End of the Mughal Rule13. The Army was reorganized14. India was economically exploited15. Nationalism began to rise16. Introduction of Policy of Divide and Rule
Appeasement.
The Doctrine of Lapse was introduced by Lord Dalhousie, the British Governor-General of India, in the mid-19th century. This policy allowed the British East India Company to annex any princely state if the ruler died without a male heir, thereby expanding British control over Indian territories. The doctrine played a significant role in the annexation of several states and contributed to growing resentment towards British rule, ultimately leading to the Indian Rebellion of 1857.
A) the british began to respect American culture B) the colonist began to question british authority C) the british began to treat Americans as equals D) the colonist became more dependent on Britain
sir george barlow
1. End of the rule of the Company2. Alteration In the British Policy towards the Indian States3. Conclusion of Peshwaship4. End of the Mughal Rule5. The Army was reorganized6. India was economically exploited7. Nationalism began to rise8. Introduction of Policy of Divide and Rule The impact of the Revolt :9. End of the rule of the Company10. Alteration in the British Policy towards the Indian States11. Conclusion of Peshwaship12. End of the Mughal Rule13. The Army was reorganized14. India was economically exploited15. Nationalism began to rise16. Introduction of Policy of Divide and Rule
how did the british officials change their policy toward the indians after the french and indian war
Jackson believed in Indian removal to free their lands for development.
Appeasement.
The Doctrine of Lapse was introduced by Lord Dalhousie, the British Governor-General of India, in the mid-19th century. This policy allowed the British East India Company to annex any princely state if the ruler died without a male heir, thereby expanding British control over Indian territories. The doctrine played a significant role in the annexation of several states and contributed to growing resentment towards British rule, ultimately leading to the Indian Rebellion of 1857.
The British officially ended slavery in 1833 when the Slavery Abolition Act took effect.
A) the british began to respect American culture B) the colonist began to question british authority C) the british began to treat Americans as equals D) the colonist became more dependent on Britain
Kamala Gadre has written: 'Indian way to socialism' -- subject(s): Economic policy, Social policy 'The coming struggle for trusteeship' -- subject(s): Economic policy, Investments, British, British Investments
sir george barlow
For Apex it’s:Replacing the Indian government with a bureaucracy controlled by the British
C. W. Newbury has written: 'British policy towards West Africa'
The policy of the British Government was against encouraging industrial development in India. No incentives were offered to Indian industries for their growth. There were many desired and undesired hurdles placed in the way of the growth of Indian industry. Whatever industrial development took place in India was in spite of the negative and hostile attitude of the British Government .