Roosevelt would have used the Roosevelt Corollary to defend his actions during the intervention in the Dominican Republic in 1905. The Corollary, an extension of the Monroe Doctrine, justified U.S. intervention in Latin America to stabilize the region and prevent European powers from intervening. Roosevelt argued that the U.S. had a responsibility to maintain order and protect American interests in the Western Hemisphere, thereby asserting a proactive role in regional affairs.
He was eager to enlist Latin American allies to defend the Western Hemisphere against dictators.
Yes, they and their government took several actions to defend against the air attack and try to keep the civilian casualties low.
Yes, John Adams was a student of the Enlightenment and therefore agreed with Voltaire's saying "I may not agree with you but I will defend to the death your right to say it" (that isn't the exact quote, but you hopefully get the idea). Extend this belief unto actions, and what we have here is John Adams.
why did hamilton defend the loyalists in court after the american revolution
Justinian was persuaded to stay and defend Constantinople by Theodora, his wife.
Teddy Roosevelt spent some time in the west when he was a young man. During that time, he grew to love and respect nature and strove in his life to defend it.
Simple. Explain to the court why you thought your actions were lawful and not in violation.
2 defend the shooter and otherwise its not fair if there a 2 shooters and just 1 defender
the right to receive protection from state government and the right to sue and defend actions in court.
Such action was needed to defend American interests.
It means he is choosing who'll he'll defend, stand up for, or support in their actions or words.
An incident similar to the epic Aliguyon Hudhud in a modern context could be a hero rising up to defend their community against a powerful external threat, using not just physical strength but also wisdom and strategy to achieve victory. This could be seen in the actions of activists advocating for environmental conservation, standing up against large corporations to protect land and resources for future generations.
To give and excuse is to give an expanation to defend or lesson blame for ones actions. To give a reason is to simply state a basis or cause for ones actions.
You should ask a local attorney for specifics about your incident. However you are generally allowed to defend any person in any place as long as your actions are reasonable. It would not be reasonable to shoot someone because they slapped your brother, it would probably be reasonable to knock down a 30 year old man punching your six year old brother. As always, once a physical attack stops, so should the physical defense.
If the officer who observes it believes that it is a distraction to your driving, he can issue a ticket for it and you can defend your actions in court.
The analogy of attack and defend as condemn is to criticize. Both pairs involve opposing actions or responses, with attack and condemn being more forceful and aggressive, while defend and criticize involve protecting or evaluating something with a more nuanced approach.
"Defend your honor" refers to taking actions to protect and maintain your reputation, integrity, and dignity in the face of challenges or accusations that may threaten them. It involves standing up for oneself and one's values to maintain a sense of respect and self-worth.